5
$\begingroup$

Let $f(x,y) = ax^2 + 2bxy + cy^2 \in \mathbb{Z}[x,y]$ be a positive definite binary quadratic form with even discriminant. We say that $f$ is primitive if $\gcd(a,2b,c) = 1$ and it is reduced if $0 < a < c$ and $|2b| \leq a$. Can we count, on average, those $f$ satisfying the above conditions and the condition that $\gcd(b,c) = 1$?

If we do not impose that $\gcd(b,c) = 1$, then the average count was done by Siegel. In particular he proved that

$$\displaystyle \sum_{N \leq x} h_{-4N} \sim \frac{4\pi}{21 \zeta(3)} x^{3/2}, $$

where $h_{-4N}$ is the number of reduced and primitive positive definite binary quadratic forms with discriminant $-4N$.

To more precisely formulate my question, put $h_{-4N}^\ast$ to be the number of reduced, primitive, and positive definite binary quadratic forms $f(x,y) = ax^2 + 2bxy + cy^2$ such that $N = ac - b^2$ and $\gcd(b,c) = 1$. Then can one give an asymptotic estimate for the quantity

$$\displaystyle \sum_{N \leq x} h_{-4N}^\ast?$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I'm curious what motivates the side condition $\gcd(b,c)=1$? $\endgroup$ – Stopple May 25 '16 at 16:08
  • $\begingroup$ This is for a project where I am attempting to count certain binary quartic forms which are sorted by reduced, primitive, and positive definite binary quadratic forms. This sorting allows one to count $\text{GL}_2(\mathbb{Z})$-equivalence classes of such quartic forms nicely, but not the $\text{PGL}_2(\mathbb{Q})$-orbits. One of the difficulties that arise is when the associated quadratic form has $\gcd(b,c) > 1$. $\endgroup$ – Stanley Yao Xiao May 25 '16 at 16:16
  • $\begingroup$ I believe I know the right answer; one simply needs to change the factor $1/\zeta(3)$ coming from requiring $\gcd(a,2b,c) = 1$ to $1/\zeta(2)$ which only requires $\gcd(b,c) = 1$. I am not sure how hard it is to prove this though $\endgroup$ – Stanley Yao Xiao May 25 '16 at 16:43
1
$\begingroup$

Not an answer, but long for a comment. Siegel's theorem referenced above does not see the individual forms, it instead uses the Dirichlet class number formula for $L(1,\chi)$ and estimates the asymptotics of the sum.

If I were trying to prove the desired result, I'd first want a version of the proof that estimated the asymptotics of the residue of the sum over Epstein zeta functions, in order to see the individual forms. To pick out those with $\gcd(b,c)=1$, I would write this condition as $$ \sum_{d|\gcd(b,c)}\mu(d), $$ and then try to change the order of summation

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.