5
$\begingroup$

Suppose that $f \colon X\rightarrow S$ is a proper morphism of reduced and irreducible complex spaces and $f$ is a smooth deformation in the sense of Kodaira and Spencer. If we know each fiber $X_s$, $s\in S$ is a Moishezon manifold, can we conclude $f \colon X\rightarrow S$ is a Moishezon morphism? Here Moishezon morphism is defined as following: $f$ is called Moishezon if $f$ is bimeromorphic to a locally projective morphism $g\colon Y\rightarrow S$.

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ The morphism $f$ need not be Moishezon. One example is when $X$ is a Hopf surface, $(\mathbb{C}^2 \setminus\{(0,0)\})/\sim$ with $(x,y)\sim(qx,qy)$ for a nonzero complex number $q$ of modulus $\neq 1$. The target $S$ is $\mathbb{CP}^1 = (\mathbb{C}^2\setminus\{(0,0)\})/\mathbb{C}^\times$, and every fiber of $f$ is isomorphic to the elliptic curve $E=\mathbb{C}^\times/q^{\mathbb{Z}}$. All of the fibers are Moishezon, but the morphism is not Moishezon. $\endgroup$ – Jason Starr May 23 '16 at 14:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JS: how does one prove that $f$ is not Moishezon? $\endgroup$ – Qfwfq May 23 '16 at 19:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JS: Also, is the conclusion not compatible with HassanJolany's answer below or am I missing something? $\endgroup$ – Qfwfq May 23 '16 at 19:55
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ You are missing something. Hassan Jolany tells you that $f$ is locally Moishezon, over any small neighborhood of a point in $S$. This is much weaker than being globally Moishezon. In the example of Jason Starr the fibration is even locally trivial. If this $f$ were Moishezon, the Hopf surface would be Moishezon, which it is not. $\endgroup$ – abx May 24 '16 at 5:21
1
$\begingroup$

A Moishezon manifold $M$ is a compact complex manifold such that the field of meromorphic functions on each component $M$ has transcendence degree equal the complex dimension of the component: $\dim_\mathbf{C}M=a(M)=\operatorname{tr.deg.}_\mathbf{C}\mathbf{C}(M).$

Let $\pi: X\to S$ be a proper morphism of complex spaces. If $\pi$ is a Moishezon morphism, i.e., bimeromorphic over $S$ to a projective morphism then each fiber of $\pi$ is a Moishezon space. Conversely, if $\pi$ is smooth and each fiber is Moishezon, then for every $s \in S$ there exists a neighborhood set $U$ such that $\pi|_U$ is Moishezon

See, Akira FUJIKI, Deformation of Uniruled Manifolds , Publ. RIMS, Kyoto Univ. 17 (1981), 687-702.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Daniel Barlet recently showed(there is anoher proof also by Dan Popovici mat.univie.ac.at/~esiprpr/esi2238.pdf) that Let $ \pi : X \to S$ a proper surjective map between irreducible complex spaces. Let $S^∗$ be a dense Zariski open set in $S$. Assume that for each $s ∈ S^∗$ the fiber $ X_s $of $π$ at $s$ are Moishezon, then the central fibre $X_0$ is Moishezon arxiv.org/pdf/1705.01743.pdf $\endgroup$ – user21574 Dec 6 '17 at 3:49
  • $\begingroup$ I have not been able to find a proof of the (second part of the) statement of the answer in the literature. The paper [Fujiki, Deformation of Uniruled Manifolds] refers to [Fujiki, Relative algebraic reduction and relative Albanese map...] where I unfortunately could not find a proof. Did I miss something ? $\endgroup$ – Olivier Benoist Oct 5 '18 at 14:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.