3
$\begingroup$

Does anyone know definition of Levi-Civita connection map that defined as $K: TTM\to TM$. and how to prove the following theorem:

Theorem: If $X\in\mathfrak{X}(M)$ be a vector field over $M$ and $K:TTM\to TM$ Levi-Civita connection map then $$K\circ dX=\nabla X$$ where $dX$ is derivation of vector field $X$ as a map.

Thanks.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

After the comment of Jez, here is the corrected answer:

There is the well-defined vertical bundle $VTM\subset TTM\to TM$ given as the kernel of the (differential of the) projection. Moreover, for any $v\in TM,$ there is a natural identification $\Phi$ of $V_vTM$ with $T_\pi(v)M.$

Using the Levi-Civita connection (or ans other connection), you can construct a horizontal bundle $HTM\subset TTM\to TM$ with the properties: (1) $$HTM\oplus VTM=TTM,$$ $d\pi\colon H_vTM\to T_{\pi(v)}M$ is an isomorphism for any $v\in TM$ and (3) for any vector fields X and Y we have $$\Phi^{-1} \nabla_XY= \pi^{VTM} dY(X),$$ where $\pi^{VTM}$ is the projection to $VTM$ corresponding to the splitting (1). The proof is the same as the proof of existence of the geodesic spray. From these properties, you obtain that $K=\Phi\circ \pi^{VTM}$ is satisfying your equation.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Isn't $\mathrm{d}\pi \circ \pi^{HTM}$ just $\mathrm{d}\pi$? I think instead you should project onto $VTM$ along $HTM$, then use the identification of $VT_vM$ with $T_{\pi(v)}M$. $\endgroup$ – Jez May 18 '16 at 9:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Dear Jez, you are right, I was mixing up things. $\endgroup$ – Sebastian May 18 '16 at 9:21
  • $\begingroup$ @Sebastian Thanks for your answer. but you don't defined the connection map and what is it properties. $\endgroup$ – C.F.G May 18 '16 at 10:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Dear C.F.G., the connection map is given by the projection onto the vertical bundle composed with its identification with the (pull-back of the) tangent bundle of $M.$ The idea is that one does not need to know the horizontal part of the derivative of a section (as it is basically the identity), so only the vertical part maters. In order to compute the vertical part, one needs a complementary bundle, the horizontal one. A vector $\hat X$ in TTM lies in $HTM$ if and only if it is the germ of a parallel section. $\endgroup$ – Sebastian May 19 '16 at 7:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.