1
$\begingroup$

Given a compact Riemann surface $M$ and two double coverings $\hat\pi\colon \hat M\to M$ and $\tilde\pi\colon \tilde M\to M$ which are branched over the same points $p_1,..,p_n\in M.$ As is well-known, the two coverings are related by an element in $H_1(M,\mathbb Z_2).$ Is there any (explicitely) known relationship between the Jacobians of $\hat M$ annd $\tilde M$? Is there an isogeny between them?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ What if $n$ equals $0$? $\endgroup$ May 13, 2016 at 12:21
  • $\begingroup$ I am also interested in the case of $n=0$. $\endgroup$
    – Sebastian
    May 13, 2016 at 12:28

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

They are not isogeneous in general. For an explicit example, take the case $n=0$ and $C$ hyperelliptic, so that we have a double covering $C\rightarrow \mathbb{P}^1$ branched along a subset $B$ of $\mathbb{P}^1$. Étale double coverings $\tilde{C}\rightarrow C $ correspond to partitions $B=B'\cup B''$, with $\#B'$ and $\#B''$ even; the Jacobian of $\tilde{C} $ is isogeneous to $JC\times JC'\times JC''$, where $C'$ and $C''$ are the double cover of $\mathbb{P}^1$ branched along $B'$ and $B''$ (this is well explained in Mumford's Prym varieties I, §7). Take for instance $g(C)=2$, $B=\{0,1,\infty,\lambda_1 ,\lambda _2,\lambda _3\} $; you get some double étale coverings $\tilde{C}_i $ of $C$ with $J\tilde{C}_i $ isogeneous to $JC\times E_i$, where $E_i$ is the double cover of $\mathbb{P}^1$ branched along $\{0,1,\infty,\lambda_i\}$. It is pretty clear that you can choose the $\lambda _i$ so that the elliptic curves $E_i$ are not isogeneous, and therefore the only common factor of $J\tilde{C}_1 $ and $J\tilde{C}_2 $ is $JC$.

$\endgroup$
0
3
$\begingroup$

Here is an example of a hyperelliptic $M$ that admits two Prym varieties that are not isogenous (actually, there are no nonzero homomorphisms between them). Namely, let $g \ge 8$ be an integer, $f(x)$ an irreducible degree $(2g+2)$ polynomial over the rationals, whose Galois group is the full symmetric group $\mathbf{S}_{2g+2}$ of permutations on $(2g+2)$ letters. (E.g., one may take $f(x)=x^{2g+2}-x-1$, thanks to results of Selmer and Osada.) Take as $M$ the (compact) genus $g$ Riemann surface of $\sqrt{f(x)}$, i.e., the smooth projective model of the plane algebraic curve $y^2=f(x)$. Then (thanks to Mumford and Dalalyan) the unramified double coverings of $M$ are indexed by partions of the set $R_f$ of of roots of $f(x)$ into a disjoint union of nonempty even cardinalty sets $T$ and $S$ such that the corresponding Prym variety is a product $J_S\times J_T$ of the jacobians of hyperelliptic curves $C_S:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in S}(x-\alpha)$ and $C_T:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in T}(x-\alpha)$ respectively. The dimensions of $J_S$ and $J_T$ are $(\#(S)-2)/2$ and $(\#(T)-2)/2$ respectively.

Assume that each of $S$ and $T$ has, at least, 4 elements, i.e., both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are positive-dimensional. By results of MR2961409 (arXiv:1012.3731 [math.AG])(Sect.5), the Galois property of $f(x)$ imply that both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are absolutely simple complex abelian varieties and there are no nonzero homomorphism between them. Now let us choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $(2g)$-element set $S^{\prime}$ and two-element $T^{\prime}$. Then the corresponding Prym variety is $J_{S^{\prime}}$, which (by results of MR1748293, arXiv:math/9909052 [math.AG]) is an absolutely simple $(g-1)$-dimensional complex abelian variety. Since both $\dim(J_S)$ and $\dim(J_T)$ are strictly less than $g-1$ (actually, they are both positive and their sum is $g-1$), there are no nonzero homomorphisms between $J_S$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, between $J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, and therefore between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$. More generally, one may choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $S_1$ and $T_1$ in such a way that $\#(S)\ne \#(S_1), \#(S) \ne \#(T_1)$ and then the dimension arguments imply that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between absolutely simple $J_S$ and $J_{S_1}$, $J_S$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{S_1}$. This implies that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S_1}\times J_{T_1}$.

One should add that the jacobian of the corresponding covering space is isogenous to a product of the jacobian $J(M)$ of $M$ and the corresponding Prym variety. Notice that in our case $J(M)$ is an absolutely simple $g$-dimensional complex abelian variety.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Dear Yuri, thank you for writing up this counter example in great detail. $\endgroup$
    – Sebastian
    May 13, 2016 at 18:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.