Let $E/k$ be an elliptic curve over algebraically closed field of characteristic $p$ with CM, for simplicity, by the maximal order of a quadratic imaginary field $K/\mathbb{Q}$.

Suppose that $p$ is split in $K$ so that $E$ is ordinary, and write $p\cal{O}_K=\frak{p}\overline{\frak{p}}$. I would like to consider two subgroup schemes $E[\frak{p}]$ and $E[\overline{\frak{p}}]$ of $E[p]$ and ask the following two questions:

  • Is it true in general that $\text{rank}\ E[\frak{p}]$= $\text{rank}\ E[\overline{\frak{p}}]=p$ ? I think I have an argument that goes through lifting to characteristic zero and the Main Theorem of CM but probably there is a simpler way.


  • Is it true that $E[\frak{p}]$ and $E[\overline{\frak{p}}]$ can be seen as connected and étale parts (or viceversa) of $E[p]$? In the setting I have chosen for this question I don't see why this should be true (for example what distinguish $\frak{p}$ from $\overline{\frak{p}} $ ?) but it seems reasonable when I see $E/k$ as the reduction at the appropriate prime (above $\frak{p}$ or $\overline{\frak{p}} $) of a CM elliptic curve over a number field.

Thank you for your help.

  • $\begingroup$ Hmm... let $\phi \in \mathrm{End}(E)$ be the Frobenius, and let $\hat{\phi} \in \mathrm{End}(E)$ be its dual. Then $\phi$ and $\hat{\phi}$ each have degree $p$, and clearly one of them lies in $\mathfrak{p}$ and the other in $\bar{\mathfrak{p}}$. This may be one way of seeing that the ranks of $E[\mathfrak{p}]$ and $E[\bar{\mathfrak{p}}]$ are $\leq p$ without lifting to characteristic $0$. $\endgroup$ – Jeff Yelton May 13 '16 at 16:07
  • $\begingroup$ As for "what distinguishes $\mathfrak{p}$ from $\bar{\mathfrak{p}}$", this probably has something to do with the choice of CM-type of a lifting of $E$ to $\tilde{E} / \mathbb{C}$; that is, a choice of embedding $\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{K}} \hookrightarrow \mathbb{C}$. But at the moment I'm not sure of a full answer to your questions. $\endgroup$ – Jeff Yelton May 13 '16 at 16:23

Formulating precisely this question helped me to figure it out (probably).

Fix an isomorphism $O_K\cong\text{End}(E)$ identifying complex conjugation with "taking the dual isogeny". Then we can write $\frak{p}=(p,\alpha)$, $\overline{\frak{p}}=(p,\overline{\alpha})$ (by the theory of Dedekind domains) where $\alpha$, $\overline{\alpha}$ are isogenies with $\alpha\circ \overline{\alpha}=\overline{\alpha}\circ\alpha=[p\cdot m]_E$ for some integer $m$. It follows that $E[\frak{p}]$$=E[\alpha]\times_E E[p]$ and $E[\overline{\frak{p}}]=E[\overline{\alpha}]\times_E E[p]$ finite flat group schemes.

The fact that distinguish between the two ideal is the action on the tangent space at the origin of $E$. Indeed $\underline{\omega}_{E/k}$ is one dimensional over $k$ and so the $O_K$-action is through an algebra homomorphism $\iota: O_K\to k$. Suppose that $\frak{p}=\ker\iota$ then $\overline{\alpha}$ is étale because induces an isomorphism between tangent spaces, hence $E[\overline{\alpha}]$ is étale over $\text{Spec}(k)$ and so also $E[\overline{\frak{p}}]$.

Finally, restricting the isogeny $\alpha$ to $E[p]$ gives an exact sequence of finite free group schemes $0\to E[\frak{p}]$$\to E[p]\overset{\alpha}{\to} E[\overline{\frak{p}}]\to 0$ because $p\nmid\alpha$ and $p\nmid\overline{\alpha}$. Moreover it is the connected-ètale sequence for $E[p]$ because $E[\overline{\frak{p}}]$ is ètale.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.