4
$\begingroup$

A topological space $(X,\tau)$ is said to be zero-dimensional Hausdorff (zdH) if for $x\neq y\in X$ there is $C\subseteq X$ clopen (closed and open) such that $x\in C$, but $y\notin C$.

We say a zdH space $(X,\tau)$ is minimal zdH if for each topology $\tau' \subseteq \tau$ on $X$ with $\tau' \neq \tau$ the space $(X,\tau')$ is not zdH any more.

Clearly every compact zdH, such as $\omega+1$ with the interval topology, is minimal zdH as it is minimal Hausdorff. (I don't know whether there are non-compact minimal zdH spaces.)

Does every zdH topology contain a minimal zdH topology?

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ In General Topology zdH-spaces are usually called totally disconnected spaces, see e.g., en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totally_disconnected_space $\endgroup$ – Taras Banakh May 2 '16 at 15:25
  • $\begingroup$ @TarasBanakh Isn't the space of all square-summable sequences of rational numbers under the usual $L^2$-metric a totally disconnected Hausdorff space which is not zero-dimensional? (Engelking, p.364 seems to think so.) $\endgroup$ – user642796 May 2 '16 at 16:10
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @arjafi: Exactly! $\endgroup$ – Taras Banakh May 2 '16 at 16:24
  • $\begingroup$ @TarasBanakh, maybe I am just being silly, but it seems that, in your response to arjafi above, you agree that zdH is not equivalent to total disconnectedness; but, in your answer below, you assert that it is. $\endgroup$ – LSpice May 2 '16 at 18:33
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @L_Spice: The problem arises from a double use of the adverb "zero-dimensional". Its standard meaning is the existence of a base consisting of clopen sets and in this meaning the Erdos space mentined by arjafi is not zero-dimensional. On the other hand, "zero-dimensional Hausdorff" in the sense of Dominic van der Zypen is the same as "totally disconnected". So, the Erdos space mentiened by arjafi is zero-dimensional Hausdorff (i.e. totally disconnected) but not zero-dimensional (in the standard sense). $\endgroup$ – Taras Banakh May 2 '16 at 20:33
7
$\begingroup$

First note that a topological space is zdH if and only if it is totally disconnected.

Theorem 1. Each minimal totally disconnected topological space $X$ is compact.

Proof: The total disconnectedness implies that $X$ admits an injective continuous map $f:X\to K$ to the Cantor cube $K$. The minimality of $X$ implies that the map $f$ is a topological embedding. Assuming that $Y=f(X)$ is not compact, take any point $y\in Y$, and any cluster point $z\in \bar Y\setminus Y$. Consider the quotient space $K/\{y,z\}$ and the quotient map $q:K\to K/\{y,z\}$. It can be shown that the space $K/\{y,z\}$ is zero-dimensional and the map $q\circ f:X\to K/\{y,z\}$ is not a topological embedding, which contradicts the minimality of $X$. This contradiction completes the proof of the compactness of $X$.

Corollary. Let $X$ be a countable zero-dimensional space without isolated points. The topology of $X$ is totally disconnected but contains no minimal totally disconnected topology.

Proof. Assuming that the topology of $X$ contains a minimal totally disconnected topology, we conclude that $X$ admits a continuous bijective map $f:X\to Y$ onto a minimal totally disconnected space $Y$. By the continuity of $f$, the countable space $Y$ has no isolated points and hence cannot be compact (by the Baire Theorem). By Theorem 1, $Y$ cannot be minimal totally disconnected.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.