Let $X$ be a smooth projective variety over $\mathbb{F}_{q}$. For each pair of positive integers $n$ and $d$, let $\text{Chow}_{n,d}(X)$ denote the (coarse) moduli space of $n$-cycles of degree $d$ on $X$, as defined in §3 of Kollár's book Rational Curves on Algebraic Varieties. Fixing $n>0$, define $Z_{n}(X,t)$ to be the formal power series $$Z_{n}(X,t)\ \overset{{}_{\text{def}}}{=}\ \sum_{d=0}^{\infty}\big|\text{Chow}_{n,d}(X)(\mathbb{F}_{q})\big|\ \!t^{d}.$$ What is known about this series? Does it have obvious pathological behavior? Are there natural candidates for analogues of the Weil conjectures that one expects for $Z_{n}(X,t)$? Is there an easy way to derive any of these analogues from the Weil conjectures themselves, i.e., from the $n=0$ case?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ For projective space and for $n=\text{dim}(X)-1$, there are summands of the form $\sum q^{d^n/n!} t^d$. That certainly is not the formal power series of any rational function. $\endgroup$ Apr 17, 2016 at 9:27

1 Answer 1


As Jason Starr notes in his comment, the series I ask about cannot be rational in general. There's more to the story though. I recently stumbled across several papers where Elizondo and Kimura study motivic versions of these series:

      [1] Elizondo, E. Javier. The Euler Series of Restricted Chow Varieties.

      [2] Elizondo, E. Javier and Kimura, Shun-Ichi. Irrationality of motivic series of Chow varieties.

      [3] Elizondo, E. Javier and Kimura, Shun-Ichi. Rationality of motivic Chow series modulo $\mathbb{A}^{\!1}$-homotopy.

I share some of their results here.
      Fix a ground field $k$. Let $\mathcal{M}^{\text{rat}}_{k}$ denote the category of Chow motives, and let $K_{0}(\mathcal{M}^{\text{rat}}_{k})$ denote its Grothendieck ring. Let $K(\text{Var}_{k})$ denote the Grothendieck ring of varieties. If $\overline{k}=k$ and $\text{char}_{\ \!}k=0$,then we have a ring homomorphism $K(\text{Var}_{k})\longrightarrow K_{0}(\mathcal{M}^{\text{rat}}_{k})$ taking the class of each smooth projective $k$-variety to the class of its Chow motive. In each of the rings of formal power series $K_{0}(\mathcal{M}^{\text{rat}}_{k})[\![t]\!]$ or $K(\text{Var}_{k})[\![t]\!]$, we can consider a motivic version of the series I ask about, namely $$ \sum_{d=0}^{\infty}\text{Chow}_{n,d}(X)\ t^{d}, $$ where the coefficients $\text{Chow}_{n,d}(X)$ denote either the $K_{0}(\mathcal{M}^{\text{rat}}_{k})$- or $K(\text{Var}_{k})$-classes of the corrresponding Chow varieities. In [2, Theorem 4.5], Elizondo and Kimura show that if $n\ge 2$, then the motivic Chow series $$ \sum_{d=0}^{\infty}\text{Chow}_{n-1,d}(\mathbb{P}^{n})\ \!t^{d}\ =\ \sum_{d=0}^{\infty}\frac{1-{\mathbb{A}^{\!1}}^{\left(\!\begin{smallmatrix} n+d \\ d\end{smallmatrix}\!\right)}}{1-\mathbb{A}^{1}}\ \!t^{d} $$ in $K_{0}(\mathcal{M}^{\text{rat}}_{k})[\![t]\!]$ is irrational. But then in [3], they make the following observation: If we imagine giving $\mathbb{A}^{1}$ some family of measures $\mu(\mathbb{A}^{1})$ such that the limit $\mu(\mathbb{A}^{1})\to 1$ makes sense, then in this limit the above series becomes $$ \frac{1}{(1-t)^{n+1}}. $$ In particular, it is rational. This leads to the idea of passing to an "$(\mathbb{A}^{\!1}\to 1)$-limit" , which we can think of as being some kind of motivic version of a deformation retraction of $\mathbb{A}^{1}$ to a point. Concretely, this means passing to one of the quotients $K_{0}(\mathcal{M}^{\text{rat}}_{k})_{\mathbb{A}^{1}}\overset{{}_{\text{def}}}{=}K_{0}(\mathcal{M}^{\text{rat}}_{k})\big/\!\sim$ or $K(\text{Var}_{k})_{\mathbb{A}^{1}}\overset{{}_{\text{def}}}{=}K(\text{Var}_{k})\big/\!\sim$, where "$\sim$" is the relation $$ X\times\mathbb{A}^{1}\ \sim\ X. $$       Assume $\overline{k}=k$ and $\text{char}_{\ \!}k=0$. If $X$ is a smooth projective $k$-variety, then for each $n\in \mathbb{Z}_{\ge0}$, let $B_{n}(X)$ denote the commutative monoid of connected components of the scheme $\text{Chow}_{n}(X)\overset{{}_{\text{def}}}{=}\bigsqcup_{d=0}^{\infty}\text{Chow}_{n,d}(X)$. For each $\beta\in B_{n}(X)$, let $\text{Chow}_{n,\beta}(X)$ denote the corresponding component of $\text{Chow}_{n}(X)$. Then it is somewhat more natural to consider the motivic Chow series $$ \sum_{\beta\in B_{n}(X)}^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\text{Chow}_{n,\beta}(X)\ t^{\beta} $$ inside either of the rings $$ K(\text{Var}_{k})_{\mathbb{A}^{1}}\big[\!\big[B_{n}(X)\big]\!\big] \ \ \ \ \ \ \mbox{or}\ \ \ \ \ \ K_{0}(\mathcal{M}^{\text{rat}}_{k})_{\mathbb{A}^{1}}\big[\!\big[B_{n}(X)\big]\!\big] $$ Elizondo and Kimura prove the following:

  • If $C_{1}$ and $C_{2}$ are very general curves, then for each $n\ge 0$, the motivic Chow series $$ \sum_{\beta\in B_{n}(C_{1}\times C_{2})}^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\text{Chow}_{n,\beta}(C_{1}\times C_{2})\ t^{\beta} $$ is rational [3, Corollary 3.11].

  • If $Y_{\Sigma}$ is a smooth projective toric variety, then for each $n\in\mathbb{Z}_{\ge0}$, its motivic Chow series in $K_{0}(\mathcal{M}^{\text{rat}}_{k})_{\mathbb{A}^{1}}\big[\!\big[B_{n}(Y_{\Sigma})\big]\!\big]$ is rational [3, Corollary 4.4], and satisfies the formula $$ \sum_{\beta\in B_{n}(Y_{\Sigma})}^{\infty}\!\!\!\!\!\!\text{Chow}_{n,\beta}(Y_{\Sigma})\ t^{\beta} \ \ = \prod_{\sigma\in\Sigma(n)}\frac{1}{1-t^{\beta(\sigma)}}, $$ where $\beta(\sigma)$ denotes the $B_{n}(Y_{\Sigma})$-class of the torus-orbit corresponding to $\sigma$. Because the Euler characteristic preserves $\mathbb{A}^{\!1}$-homotopy, this provides a motivic argument behind Elizondo's earlier proof that each series $$ \sum_{d=0}^{\infty}\chi\big(\text{Chow}_{n,d}(Y_{\Sigma})\big)\ \!t^{d} \ \ \in\ \ \mathbb{Z}[\![t]\!] $$ is rational [1]. It also generalizes the formula for the motivic L-function, modulo $\mathbb{A}^{\!1}$-homotopy, of a smooth projective toric variety $Y_{\Sigma}$ that comes from the motivic decomposition of $Y_{\Sigma}$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.