In his answer here Qing Liu mentioned "the 'discriminant' of X which measures the defect of a functorial isomorphism which involves powers of the relative dualizing sheaf of X/R."

Could somebody give a reference for or explain this?

I ask because there is a natural definition of conductor of a proper morphism to a normal scheme (for example as in Serre's "Algebraic groups and class fields"), and some relationship between the conductor and discriminant, but the definitions of discriminants I have seen always seem situation-specific and ad-hoc.



3 Answers 3


The "magistral paper of Takeshi Saito" mentioned by Qing Liu is the following: 'Conductor, Discriminant, and the Noether formula of Arithmetic surfaces', Duke Math Journal, vol. 57, no. 1. See here if you have a subscription to Duke: projecteuclid.org/euclid.dmj/1077306852 The definition of the discriminant is at the top of the second page. Or see section three of Liu's notes which he referenced in his reply to which you provided a link.

But for what it's worth, here is a quick answer (basically copied from Saito's paper):

Let $T$ be a nice scheme (spectrum of a field is enough for us), and $g:Y\to T$ a relative curve (i.e. geometrically connected, proper, relative dimension one). When $Y$ is smooth over $T$, there is a functorial isomorphism $\Delta:\det Rg_*(\omega_{Y/T}^{\otimes 2})\to(\det Rg_*\omega_{Y/T})^{\otimes 13}$. This is due to Deligne (from this unpublished letter to Quillen, link thanks to D. Eriksson's answer).

Now let $\mathcal{O}_K$ be a Henselian discrete valuation ring with algebraically closed residue field, put $S=\mbox{Spec}\mathcal{O}_K$, and let $X\to S$ be a relative curve which is regular. We have an invertible $\mathcal{O}_K$-module

$V=\mbox{Hom} (\det Rg_*(\omega_{X/S}^{\otimes 2}),(\det Rg_*\omega_{X/S})^{\otimes 13})$.

and Deligne's result, applied to the generic fibre of $X$, produces a natural element $\Delta\in V\otimes_{\mathcal{O}_K} K$. The discriminant of $X$ is defined to be the order of $\Delta$ (that is, the unique $d\in\mathbb{Z}$ such that $\mathcal{O}_K\Delta=\mathfrak{p}^d V$).

I do not know if there is a similar notion of discriminant for higher dimensional $S$-schemes.

  • $\begingroup$ The generic fiber has to be assumed smooth in the 2nd part (so the first part can be applied there). Too bad that Deligne is an oracle here -- i.e., no published reference for the proof of the existence of the asserted general isomorphism $\Delta$. Since 13 = 1 + 12, this also nicely generalizes all of the "classical" stuff with 12's in the genus-1 case. $\endgroup$
    – BCnrd
    May 5, 2010 at 12:34
  • $\begingroup$ Whoops, yes, you are right, thank you. I was imagining that $K$ was perfect (i.e. characteristic zero), so that the regularity of $X$ would imply the smoothness of the generic fibre. $\endgroup$ May 5, 2010 at 12:52
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Matthew, sadly I can't access the journal at the moment, but I can probably find it in the library. Thanks to Brian for saying where the 13 comes from. $\endgroup$ May 5, 2010 at 14:20
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @David: I didn't actually say where the 13 comes from; I just said where the 12 comes from for genus 1! I assume the 13 comes out from an argument inspired by analogy with formulas from algebraic surfaces, but the oracle status of the Deligne reference is an obstruction to saying more. I would like it if someone will explain where the 13 comes from in this general setting. $\endgroup$
    – BCnrd
    May 5, 2010 at 14:49
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ This comes from computations on the Hodge bundle on the moduli space of stable curves (Mumford: "Stability of projective varieties", Enseignement Mathématiques, 1977): 1+12=1-6n+6n^2 (n=2). $\endgroup$
    – Qing Liu
    May 5, 2010 at 22:44

It seems I don't have enough reputation to make comments, so I'll write a comment here instead: The "Lettre à Quillen" mentioned in Matthew's answer is now available on Deligne's webpage:



I want to mention that there is a published version of Deligne's letter online, namely the famous paper "Le déterminant de la cohomologie". See here:


I am trying to type and translate the paper on my own, but so far I have only translated bits of it here and there as it is lengthy. I heard from Soule that the exponent $12$, is ultimately coming from the second term contribution of the expansion of the Todd class.

In light of Brian Conrad's comment ("the oracle status of the Deligne reference is an obstruction to saying more"), I want to point out a possible mistake in Deligne's paper. Here I quote from Gerard Freixas i Montplet and Anna von Pippich's paper (see footnote of page 2):

" To be rigorous, Deligne mistakenly applies Bismut–Freed’s curvature theorem for Quillen connections. The subtle point is the compatibility of the Quillen connection with the holomorphic structure of the Knudsen–Mumford determinant. Nevertheless, the Riemann–Roch isometry he claims can be established by appealing instead to the results of Bismut–Gillet–Soule, where this compatibility is addressed. Notice however these results came later in time."

I am not sure if the issue was noticed by other people, but this may be a subtle point worth mentioning as the paper is a canonical reference in Arakelov intersection theory.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.