5
$\begingroup$

For $H=\left( \begin{smallmatrix} 0 & I_n \\ -I_n & 0 \end{smallmatrix} \right)$ and a commutative ring $F$, the symplectic group $Sp(2n,F)$ is the set of all matrices $M\in F^{2n\times 2n}$ such that $MHM^T = H$. (Here, $M^T$ means the transposed matrix.)

My question is: for $\mathbb{F}_p$ a finite field of prime order, is $Sp(2n,\mathbb{F}_p) = Sp(2n,\mathbb{Z})\otimes\mathbb F_p$, the reduction mod $p$ of $Sp(2n,\mathbb{Z})$?

$\endgroup$
8
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I'm not sure what you mean by your tensor product notation between a group and a field. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Feb 11, 2016 at 18:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I mean reduction of the coefficients mod p. Fixed. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 11, 2016 at 18:09
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The problem was not so much the notation (which is fine), but the fact that you define $\operatorname{Sp}(2n,R)$ as a group, rather than an $R$-scheme. I'm sure this is what you meant, but it isn't what you're writing. $\endgroup$
    – R.P.
    Commented Feb 11, 2016 at 18:17
  • $\begingroup$ @René: I see. And of course, the fact that it is a group does not matter for the question. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 11, 2016 at 18:20
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Are you asking whether ${\rm Sp}(2n, \mathbb{Z}) \to {\rm Sp}(2n, \mathbb{F}_p)$ is surjective? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 11, 2016 at 18:31

1 Answer 1

9
$\begingroup$

Yes: $\operatorname{Sp}(2n, \mathbb F_p)$ is generated by its root subgroups. Each root subgroup is cyclic, and generated by an element that lifts in an obvious way to $\operatorname{Sp}(2n, \mathbb Z)$.

More concretely, if I haven't messed up the calculations in your form (I'm used to a different one), then, writing $E_{i j}$ for the matrix that has a 1 in its $(i, j)$th entry and 0 elsewhere, we have that $\operatorname{Sp}(2n, \mathbb F_p)$ is generated by:

  • $\{1 + t(E_{i j} - E_{(j + n)(i + n)}) : t \in \mathbb F_p\}$ (corresponding to the root $e_i - e_j$) for $1 \le i < j \le n$,
  • $\{1 + t(E_{i(j + n)} + E_{j(i + n)}) : t \in \mathbb F_p\}$ (corresponding to the root $e_i + e_j$) for $1 \le i \ne j \le n$,
  • $\{1 + t E_{i(i + n)} : t \in \mathbb F_p\}$ (corresponding to the root $2e_i$) for $1 \le i \le n$, and
  • the transposes of the various groups above (corresponding to the negative roots).

The $e_i - e_j$ generators correspond to an elementary row operation in the upper left block, combined with its inverse transpose in the lower right block. The $e_i + e_j$ and $2e_i$ generators generate symmetric matrices in the upper right block.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .