2
$\begingroup$

Let $k$ be a ring and $\overline{k} = k[\epsilon]/\epsilon^2$. For every $f \in k[t]$ there is a unique $f' \in k[t]$ such that $f(t+\epsilon)=f(t)+\epsilon f'(t)$ holds in $\overline{k}[t]$. It follows that $f \mapsto f'$ is a derivation. For example, the leibniz rule:

$(fg)(t+\epsilon)=f(t+\epsilon) g(t+\epsilon)=(f(t)+\epsilon f'(t)) (g(t)+\epsilon g'(t))$ $=f(t) g(t) + \epsilon (f'(t) g(t) + f(t) g'(t)) + \epsilon^2 f'(t) g'(t) = (fg)(t) + \epsilon (f'(t) g(t) + f(t) g'(t))$

Now what about the chain rule $(f \circ g)'(t)=g'(t) f'(g(t))$? Is there a proof for this just using the definition above? Of course, you could argue that it suffices to take $f=x^n$ and then use inductively the leibniz rule. Or you recoqnize $f'$ as the usual formal derivative of $f$ and make an explicit calculation. But I wonder if there is a direct proof in the sense that you just use the definition of $f'$ above. Perhaps this then makes sense in more general situations as well.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As far as I remember a derivation satisfies the product rule but not necessarily the chain rule; $f\mapsto tf'$ is a derivation as well. So, without defining $f(g(t)+\epsilon h(t))$ (at least for $h(t)=g'(t)$ as in the answer Torsten Ekedahl) you can hardly prove something for compositions. $\endgroup$ Apr 30, 2010 at 8:28

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

The point is that you have the more general formula $f(g(t)+\epsilon h(t)) = f(g(t))+f'(g(t))h(t)\epsilon$. From that the chain rule follows: $$(f\circ g)(t+\epsilon) = f(g(t+\epsilon)) = f(g(t)+g'(t)\epsilon) = f(g(t))+f'(g(t))g'(t)\epsilon$$ The more general formula follows from the simpler "by substitution", i.e., by applying appropriate ring homomorphisms.

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.