3
$\begingroup$

The title says it all.

Question

If $N = qn^2$ is an odd perfect number with Euler prime $q$ and $\gcd(q,n)=1$, is it possible to have $q + 1 = \sigma(n)$?

Heuristic

From the Descartes spoof, with quasi-Euler prime $q_1$:

$$n_1 = 3003 < \sigma(n_1) = 5376 < q_1 = 22021$$

So it appears that it might be possible to prove that $q + 1 \neq \sigma(n)$.

Some Essential Estimates

Acquaah and Konyagin recently obtained the estimate $q < n\sqrt{3}$. We will use this estimate to obtain an upper bound for $\sigma(q)/n$.

Ochem and Rao recently obtained the lower bound $N > {10}^{1500}$ for the magnitude of an odd perfect number. Using this bound, together with the inequality $n < q$, gives $$I(q) < 1 + {10}^{-500}.$$

Motivation

We wish to prove the following proposition:

If $N = {q^k}{n^2}$ is an odd perfect number with Euler prime $q$, then $3 \nmid N$ implies that $q < n$.

If $q + 1 \neq \sigma(n)$, then it follows that $$I(q) + I(n) \neq \frac{\sigma(q)}{n} + \frac{\sigma(n)}{q}$$ from which we obtain $$I(q) + I(n) < \frac{\sigma(q)}{n} + \frac{\sigma(n)}{q},$$ since the reverse inequality $$\frac{\sigma(q)}{n} + \frac{\sigma(n)}{q} < I(q) + I(n)$$ will violate the inequality $I(q) < \sqrt[3]{2} < I(n)$ (see this paper). (Edit February 8 2016: Assuming $$\frac{\sigma(q)}{n} + \frac{\sigma(n)}{q} < I(q) + I(n)$$ is true, then $$\left(q < n\right) \land \left(\sigma(n) < \sigma(q)\right)$$ is false. However, I am currently unable to rule out $$\left(n < q\right) \land \left(\sigma(q) < \sigma(n)\right).$$ This particular case remains open.)

But the inequality $$I(q) + I(n) < \frac{\sigma(q)}{n} + \frac{\sigma(n)}{q}$$ implies that the biconditional $$q < n \Longleftrightarrow \sigma(q) < \sigma(n)$$ holds.

This biconditional is then a key ingredient in the proof of the proposition mentioned earlier.

My method is able to rule out $\sigma(q) = q + 1 = \sigma(n)$ if $3 \nmid n$, since we obtain $$2.799 \approx 1 + 2^{\frac{\log(6/5)}{\log(31/25)}} \leftarrow \frac{q + 1}{q} + \left(\frac{2q}{q + 1}\right)^{\frac{\log(I(5))}{\log(I(5^2))}} \leq I(q) + \left(I(n^2)\right)^{\frac{\log(I(u))}{\log(I(u^2))}}$$ $$< \frac{\sigma(q)}{q} + \frac{\sigma(n)}{n} = \frac{\sigma(q)}{n} + \frac{\sigma(n)}{q} < \sqrt{3}\left(1 + {10}^{-500}\right) + \left(1 + {10}^{-500}\right) \approx 2.732,$$ (where the smallest prime factor $u$ of $N$ satisfies $u \geq 5$), whence we arrive at a contradiction.

Further Considerations

If $\sigma(q) = q + 1 = \sigma(n)$ and $3 \mid n$, then the same method does not force a contradiction, because we then have $$2.7199 \approx 1 + 2^{\frac{\log(4/3)}{\log(13/9)}} \leftarrow \frac{q + 1}{q} + \left(\frac{2q}{q + 1}\right)^{\frac{\log(I(3))}{\log(I(3^2))}} \leq I(q) + \left(I(n^2)\right)^{\frac{\log(I(u))}{\log(I(u^2))}}$$ $$< \frac{\sigma(q)}{q} + \frac{\sigma(n)}{n} = \frac{\sigma(q)}{n} + \frac{\sigma(n)}{q} < \sqrt{3}\left(1 + {10}^{-500}\right) + \left(1 + {10}^{-500}\right) \approx 2.732,$$ where $u$ is the smallest prime factor of $N$.

Added February 7 2016

If $q + 1 = \sigma(n)$, then $\sigma(n) \equiv 2 \pmod 4$, so that $n$ takes the form $$n = {p^r}{m^2}$$ where $p$ is a prime with $p \equiv r \equiv 1 \pmod 4$ and $\gcd(p, m) = 1$. If $3 \mid n$, then $p \neq 3$, so that $3 \mid m$.

So I have $$\sigma(n) = \sigma(p^r)\sigma(m^2)$$ where $\sigma(p^r) \equiv r + 1 \equiv 2 \pmod 4$.

Since $\gcd(q, q+1) = 1$, then $\gcd(q, \sigma(n)) = 1$, so that $$\gcd(q, \sigma(p^r)\sigma(m^2)) = 1.$$ Thus, $q \nmid \sigma(p^r)$ and $q \nmid \sigma(m^2)$.

However, note that $$q \mid \sigma(n^2) = \sigma(p^{2r})\sigma(m^4).$$

Alas here is where I get stuck.

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ What is an "Euler prime"? What is a "quasi-Euler prime"? What is $I(n)$? $\endgroup$ – Seva Feb 4 '16 at 20:06
  • $\begingroup$ @Seva, the Euler prime of an odd perfect number is the unique prime that occurs to an odd exponent (conjectured to be $1$ by Descartes, Frenicle, and most recently by Sorli). $\endgroup$ – Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris Feb 4 '16 at 20:09
  • $\begingroup$ The quasi-Euler prime of the lone spoof odd perfect number that we know of (i.e., $D = 198585576189$), is the factor $q_1 = 22021$ that has odd exponent and that makes $D$ "perfect", if we pretend that $q_1 = {{19}^2}\cdot{61}$ is "prime". $\endgroup$ – Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris Feb 4 '16 at 20:13
  • $\begingroup$ The abundancy index of $n$, denoted by $I(n)$, is defined as the ratio $$I(n) = \frac{\sigma(n)}{n}.$$ $\endgroup$ – Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris Feb 4 '16 at 20:14
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Arnie, have you read this: arxiv.org/abs/1602.01591 ? $\endgroup$ – Sylvain JULIEN Feb 5 '16 at 14:33
1
$\begingroup$

A partial result is the following:

Suppose that $N=qn^2$ is a perfect number with $q$ a prime and $\sigma(n)=q+1$. If $q \mid n$, then $\sigma(n)\geq q+1$ with equality iff $n=q$. However, if $n=q$, then $N=q^3$, so $N$ is not perfect.

Hence $q \nmid n$. This implies that $$2N=\sigma(N)=\sigma(qn^2)=\sigma(q)\sigma(n^2)=(q+1)\sigma(n^2)$$ This implies that $\frac{q+1}{2} \mid N$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer, wythagoras. $q \nmid n$ follows from the fact that $\gcd(q, n) = 1$, while your second result $$\frac{q+1}{2} \mid N$$ could be strengthened to $$\frac{q+1}{2} \mid n$$ if $\frac{q+1}{2}$ happens to be prime. $\endgroup$ – Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris Feb 6 '16 at 7:02
  • $\begingroup$ Additionally, the divisibility constraint $\frac{q + 1}{2} \mid N$ is true even when $\sigma(n) \neq q + 1$. This is because $$\sigma(q) \mid \sigma(q^k) \mid \sigma(N) = 2N.$$ $\endgroup$ – Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris Feb 6 '16 at 16:45
  • $\begingroup$ @ArnieDris $\sigma(q) \nmid \sigma(q^k)$. For example $\sigma(3)=4$ while $\sigma(9)=13$. $\endgroup$ – wythagoras Feb 6 '16 at 20:25
  • $\begingroup$ For an odd perfect number $N = {q^k}{n^2}$, we have $q \equiv k \equiv 1 \pmod 4$. $\endgroup$ – Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris Feb 7 '16 at 9:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @user75829: Thank you for your comments. I will write back when I get some more nontrivial results. $\endgroup$ – Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris Mar 1 '18 at 10:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.