2
$\begingroup$

Given a category $C$, is there a name for the following category:

  • $\mathrm{Obj}(D) = \left\{ (x, y, f) \middle| x, y \in \mathrm{Obj}(C), f \in C(x, y) \right\}$
  • $D((x, y, f), (x', y', f')) = \left\{ (g, h) \middle| g \in C(x', x), h \in C(y, y'), h \circ f \circ g = f' \right\}$

This is, if you want, the final category $D$ that has a covariant functor $P : D \to C$, a contravariant functor $Q : D \to C$ and a dinatural transformation $Q \to P$.

If this is a known construct, then I am also interested in higher-dimensional generalizations (i.e. if $C$ is an $n$-category, I would like an $n$-category $D$ with similar properties).

$\endgroup$
1
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Isn't this the twisted arrow category? $\endgroup$
    – Zhen Lin
    Commented Feb 3, 2016 at 10:59

2 Answers 2

7
$\begingroup$

As Zhen Lin suggests, what you are describing is called the "twisted arrow category" $C_\#$ in Mac Lane's Categories for the Working Mathematician (see exercise IX.6.3, p.227). It goes by other names as well: for example "category of factorizations". A quick way of defining $C_\#$ is as the category of elements of $hom_C : C^{op} \times C \to \mathrm{Set}$ (in particular, the pairing of the projection functors is a discrete fibration $C_\# \to C^{op} \times C$). You can find more discussion (including higher dimensional generalizations) at the nlab.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Great, thanks! Are you aware of an occasion where someone applied this operation repeatedly, using e.g. $C_{\# \# \# \#}$? $\endgroup$
    – anuyts
    Commented Feb 3, 2016 at 14:56
2
$\begingroup$

The term "twisted arrow category" was used by Dwyer and Kan in 1983, but this is maybe not the origin. However you see, the construction is strongly related to simplicial sets, aka $(\infty,1)$-categories.

Often its homotopy type is considered. For example in a proof of Quillen's Theorem A (and B). Along these lines its referred as "subdivision category". This name should reveal a lot of material. I also vaguely remember a double application somewhere in this context..

As Noam pointed out, you can get this category by applying the (contravariant) Grothendieck-construction to the $Hom$-functor. This idea does generalize to higher categories, but I am not aware of any references.

[Dwyer,Kan,'83 - Function complexes for diagrams of simplicial sets]

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .