7
$\begingroup$

Given a Banach space $X$ and a functional $f:X\rightarrow \mathbb R$, let

$$ X_f := \{x\in X : f(x)\ge 0\} $$

("functional" means "non-zero linear functional"). Also, given a topological space $E$ and its topological subspace $A$, a retraction $r:E\rightarrow A$ is defined as a continuous map such that $r(x)=x$ for every $x\in A$.

CONJECTURE:

Let $\,X$ be an arbitrary Banach space such that for every functional $\ f:X\rightarrow \mathbb R\ $ there is a retraction $\ r:X\rightarrow X_f\ $ such that

$$ \forall_{x\ y\ \in\ X\setminus X_f}\ \ \ |r(x)-r(y)| = |x-y| $$

Then $X$ is isometric to a Hilbert space.

REMARK: I think that questions of this type were popular in the past in the case of finite dimensional spaces (mostly 3-dim?). I am not aware of the general case (I am not a specialist thus I have to ask :-). I still believe that my usage of the retraction language here is new (even in the finite-dimensional case).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Your retraction condition is wrong, you probably mean 1-Lipschitz (inequality instead of the equality). $\endgroup$ – Misha Dec 28 '15 at 12:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Misha He does not, his retraction is by a "folding" map that acts as a reflection on $X \ X_f$. $\endgroup$ – Will Sawin Dec 28 '15 at 13:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ So is this clear (or known) for, say, $X=\mathbb R^2$ with a $p$ norm? $\endgroup$ – Christian Remling Dec 28 '15 at 21:52
  • $\begingroup$ Whenever you have retractions for both $f$ and $-f$, there is an isometric reflection fixing the hyperplane $ker(f)$. Now, I think, it is known that if a Banach space admits an isometric reflection in every hyperplane, then it is Hilbert. (Even an open nonempty subset of hyperplanes should suffice.) $\endgroup$ – Misha Dec 29 '15 at 6:36
  • $\begingroup$ Related questions went back--I think--to Hugo Steinhaus, in $\mathbb R^3$. A few dozens years ago specialists in functional analysis (e.g. Pełczyński) considered such questions but always in finite-dimensional case, in the geometric language: you had a centrally symmetric convex body, you assumed some extra property, then you ask: is it a (rounded) ball. (I don't remember who asked what). I needed my new twist with retraction to get to the problem more in full. Otherwise, in some questions you neglect to talk about, say, ellipsoid + for arbitrary B-spaces it's hard to talk about f-symmetry. $\endgroup$ – Włodzimierz Holsztyński Dec 29 '15 at 8:24
4
$\begingroup$

I think that the desired result can be proved on the following lines if the dimension is at least $3$.

(1) Consider such maps for $X_f$ and $X_{-f}$. Denote them $r$ and $r'$ respectively. One can show that $f(r(x))=-f(x)$ for $x\in X\backslash X_f$. Similarly one can show that $f(r'(x))=-f(x)$ for $x\in X_f$. Let $Ax=(r(x)+r'(x))/2$. Then $A$ is a $1$-Lipschitz retraction onto $H=\{x\in X: f(x)=0\}$.

(2) Using the result of Lindenstrauss (Corollary 1 on page 270 in Michigan Math. J. 11 (1964), 263-287), we get that there is a linear projection of norm $1$ onto $H$.

(3) Using one of the known characterization of the Hilbert space, see (12.8) in Amir (Characterizations of inner product spaces, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, 1986), one gets that the space $X$ is Hilbert.

P.S. (1) One can replace usage of the Lindenstrauss result by the usage of the result of Mankiewicz (Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Ser. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys. 20 (1972), 367-371) implying that the restriction of $r$ to $X\backslash X_f$ is a restriction of a linear isometry $\widetilde r:X\to X$ to $X\backslash X_f$. Then we observe that $\frac12(I+\widetilde r)$ is a norm-$1$ projection onto $H$.

(2) One can use this observation to complete the $2$-dimensional case which we divide into two subcases:

(2a) The unit ball is a polygon: this can be done by hand.

(2b) The unit ball has infinitely many strongly exposed points. For each such point $x$ we consider the corresponding (exposing) norm-one functional $f_x$, and the half-space $H_{f_x}$. The corresponding $r$ maps $x$ to $-x$. This implies that $\hbox{ker}f_x$ and $\mathbb{R}x$ satisfy the James orthogonality relation (see Amir, page 24). Since there are infinitely many strongly exposed points $x$, the assumption of (6.12'') (Amir, page 53) is satisfied and the space is Euclidean.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ We are talking here of course about the senior Lindenstrauss (Yoram) since the Fields was awarded to Lindenstrauss (Elon) in 2010. $\endgroup$ – Włodzimierz Holsztyński Jan 1 '16 at 20:53
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, Mikhal--what a great New Year gift! Best wishes to you & to all MOers. – $\endgroup$ – Włodzimierz Holsztyński Jan 1 '16 at 20:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, I meant Joram Lindenstrauss (Elon was born in 1970). $\endgroup$ – Mikhail Ostrovskii Jan 1 '16 at 22:41
  • $\begingroup$ "Joram" --(not "Yoram"), I am very sorry for my spelling error. $\endgroup$ – Włodzimierz Holsztyński Jan 1 '16 at 23:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.