Aren't Riemannian geodesics also geodesics of the associated Cartan geometry? I was inspired by R. W. Sharpe's book on doing differential geometry through Cartan connections. Unfortunately, the book is fairly thin in terms of specific examples in Riemannian geometry, so I decided to try a few on my own. 
My first thought was to try the hyperbolic plane (modeled on $\mathbb{R}^2$ instead of just the half-plane), since the orthonormal frame bundle is still, essentially, $\mathbb{R}^2\rtimes O(2)$. This actually worked out pretty well. The metric is just $\mathrm{g}=e^{-2y}\mathrm{d}x\otimes\mathrm{d}x+\mathrm{d}y\otimes\mathrm{d}y$, and since we want to work in an orthonormal frame, I made $$\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0\end{bmatrix}=e^y\partial_x\text{ and }\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 1\end{bmatrix}=\partial_y,$$ so the associated covariant derivative is given by* $${\huge\nabla}_{\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0\end{bmatrix}}\begin{bmatrix}a \\ b\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}-b \\ a\end{bmatrix} \text{ and } {\huge\nabla}_{\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 1\end{bmatrix}}\begin{bmatrix}a \\ b\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 0\end{bmatrix}.$$
A few calculations give the Cartan connection as $$\omega\left(\begin{bmatrix}\cos\theta & -\sin\theta & x \\ \sin\theta & \cos\theta & y \\ 0 & 0 & 1\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}0 & -t & v^1 \\ t & 0 & v^2 \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}\right)=\begin{bmatrix}0 & -t-v^1 & v^1 \\ t+v^1 & 0 & v^2 \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}.$$
The problem came when I tried to find geodesics. Clearly, $\gamma:t\mapsto (0,t)$ is a geodesic in the traditional sense, but it lifts to $$\widehat\gamma:t\mapsto\begin{bmatrix}\cos\theta & -\sin\theta & 0 \\ \sin\theta & \cos\theta & t \\ 0 & 0 & 1\end{bmatrix},$$ which has tangent vectors $$\dot{\widehat\gamma}(t)=\begin{bmatrix}\cos\theta & -\sin\theta & 0 \\ \sin\theta & \cos\theta & t \\ 0 & 0 & 1\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}0 & 0 & \sin\theta \\ 0 & 0 & \cos\theta \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix},$$ so $$\omega(\dot{\widehat\gamma}(t))=\begin{bmatrix}0 & -\sin\theta & \sin\theta \\ \sin\theta & 0 & \cos\theta \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}.$$ I am fairly confident that this won't develop into a curve whose image projects to a straight line.
On the other hand, the curve $$\sigma:t\mapsto\begin{bmatrix}\cos t & \sin t & \sin t \\ -\sin t & \cos t & \cos t \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}$$ has tangent vectors $$\dot\sigma(t)=\begin{bmatrix}\cos t & \sin t & \sin t \\ -\sin t & \cos t & \cos t \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}0 & 1 & 1 \\ -1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix},$$ so $$\omega(\dot\sigma(t))=\begin{bmatrix}0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}$$ and it develops into $t\mapsto\exp\left(t\begin{bmatrix}0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}\right)$, though $\sigma$ does not project to (the image of) a geodesic.

In short, as the title asks, aren't geodesics of the Riemannian geometry also geodesics of the Cartan geometry?

My ideal answer here includes:


*

*A "yes" or "no" to the above question.

*If "yes," then where did I go wrong?

*In the unlikely event of "no," why aren't they?

*Possibly a reference to a large collection of worked-out examples of Cartan connections for Riemannian geometry that deals with geodesics


Though, any one of the above will probably work for me.
*I apologize for the poor formatting.
 A: The geodesics of Euclidean geometry in the plane are straight lines, i.e. curves that do not change direction. Their Cartan geometry is $$\omega=\begin{pmatrix}\gamma&\xi\\0&0\end{pmatrix}$$ on the oriented orthonormal frame bundle, in $x,y,\theta$ coordinates, valued in the Lie algebra of rigid motions of the plane, where $\xi=e^{i\theta}(dx+i \, dy)$, $\gamma=i \, d\theta$.
So $\gamma=0$ says that the direction does not change: a straight line, i.e. a geodesic.
Now consider the hyperbolic plane.
(When you look at the Cartan connection in your coordinates, you spot that it must involve exponential factors $e^{\pm y}$, since these arise in coordinates for your metric. You avoid exponentials by working in the moving frame, but then your Cartan connection is not expressed in $x,y,\theta$ coordinates anymore, but in the coframing.  When you write out the velocity of $\sigma(t)$ in the coframing, it doesn't turn out to be as straightforward.)
In a complex notation, the Cartan connection is simpler. On the plane, let $\underline{\xi}=e^{-y}dx+idy$ and $\underline{\gamma}=ie^{-y}dx$. 
We see this because we want metric $\xi_1^2+\xi_2^2$.
Add a variable $\theta$ and let $\xi=e^{i\theta}\underline{\xi}$, and $\gamma=\underline{\gamma}+id\theta$. The Cartan connection is the matrix $$\omega=\begin{pmatrix}\gamma&\xi\\0&0\end{pmatrix}$$ on the oriented orthonormal frame bundle, in $x,y,\theta$ coordinates, valued in the Lie algebra of rigid motions of the plane. This differs from your expression, because there are still $e^{-y}$ factors. The 1-form $\gamma$ does not vanish on your curve $\sigma(t)$. So is not a geodesic. Your first curve $(x(t),y(t),\theta(t))=(0,t,0)$ is, since $\gamma=0$ on it.
Expanding out in these coordinates, the equation of a geodesic is $\xi=c \, ds, \gamma=0$, for a complex constant $c$. We can assume that $c\ne 0$. The 1-forms $\xi$ and $\gamma$ transform when we rotate $\theta$, say the action $r_{\theta_0} : \theta\mapsto \theta+\theta_0$, as $r_{\theta_0}^*\xi= e^{i\theta_0}\xi$, $r_{\theta_0}^*\gamma=\gamma$. So we change the equations by rotation of $c$, and we can arrange that $c>0$. Rescale the $s$ variable to get $c=1$. So our equations of geodesics expand out to
$$
\cos \theta e^{-y} \frac{dx}{ds} - \sin \theta \frac{dy}{ds}=1,
$$
$$
\sin \theta e^{-y} \frac{dx}{ds} + \cos \theta \frac{dy}{ds}=0,
$$
$$
\frac{d\theta}{ds}+e^{-y}\frac{dx}{ds}=0,
$$
if I have calculated correctly.
