My original question (posted in https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1584430/can-all-power-sets-be-limit-cardinals) was:

Is it possible to create a model of ZFC, so that the cardinality of each power set is a limit cardinal (as opposed to GCH where they are always successor cardinals)?

Obviously, from Easton's theorem, this is possible for regular cardinals. I also showed that in this model strong limit cardinals must also be fixed points of the $\aleph$ function (using Shelah's upper bound from PCF), and therefore such a model would mean $2^{\aleph_\delta} \geq \aleph_{\delta^+}$. But whether we can improve Shelah's upper limit from $2^{\aleph_\delta} < \aleph_{{|\delta|}^{+4}}$ to $2^{\aleph_\delta} < \aleph_{\delta^+}$ is an open question. So for strong limit cardinals, we don't know whether such a model is possible (even for one cardinal, let alone all of them).

This leaves the singular weak limit $\delta$ case, which isn't interesting unless we assume the continuum function doesn't become constant for all $\gamma$ such that $\kappa < \gamma < \delta$. Assuming this, can we create a model of where the cardinality of the power set of singular weak limit are limit cardinals?

For a concrete example, take the following rule (which satisfies Easton's theorem, and the known limitations for singular cardinals in http://www.math.tau.ac.il/~gitik/icm5.pdf): $$2^{\aleph_\alpha} = \aleph_{\aleph_{\alpha + 1}}$$


1 Answer 1


The answer to your question is yes. In the Foreman-Woodin model The generalized continuum hypothesis can fail everywhere, $2^\kappa$ is weakly inaccessible for all infinite cardinals $\kappa.$ To be more precise, Foreman and Woodin proved the following:

Theorem 1. Con(ZFC+there exists a supercompact cardinal and infinitely many inaccessibles above it) implies Con(ZFC+$\forall \kappa, 2^\kappa$ is weakly inaccessible).

In fact we can reduce their large cardinal assumption by replacing the supercompact cardinal with a strong cardinal. See my paper with Yair Hayut On Foreman's maximality principle.

Even more surprisingly, we can prove the following:

Theorem 2 Con(ZFC+there exists a strong cardinal) implies Con(ZFC+$\forall \kappa, 2^\kappa$ is a singular cardinal).

For the proof, see again my paper with Yair Hayut stated above.

Remark. I may mention that in general you can not talk about Shelah's bound in models of Theorems 1 or 2. The point is that in these models, the strong limit points are all fixed points of the $\aleph$-function, and Shelah's bound talks about non-fixed points of the $\aleph$-function.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I have a simple follow up question, which you may already know the answer to - is there a model where $2^\kappa$ is a limit cardinal $\iff$ $\kappa$ is a limit cardinal. $\endgroup$
    – Alon Navon
    Dec 25, 2015 at 0:29
  • $\begingroup$ @AlonNavon Unfortunately, I don't know the answer. $\endgroup$ Dec 27, 2015 at 4:35
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ For completeness of MathOverflow cross-references, @AlonNavon's question in the comment above has been asked as a separate question here: mathoverflow.net/q/321543 $\endgroup$
    – Gro-Tsen
    Jan 23, 2019 at 16:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.