More precisely: let X/F_q be a smooth projective algebraic curve of genus at least 2. Does there always exist a curve Y/F_{q^d} with a finite etale projection Y -> X, such that one of the Frobenius eigenvalues on H^1(Y,Z_ell) is q^{d/2}?

I mentioned this on my blog about three weeks BMO, but this seems a much better venue. The question is motivated by some (analogous, I think?) conjectures in topology; see the blog post for more about the motivation, and what (little) I know about the question.

  • $\begingroup$ My first thought was to take a p- cover but that doesn't work because of Deuring-Shafarevich. $\endgroup$ – Felipe Voloch Apr 27 '10 at 12:15

Hi Jordan,

I have a guess on how to go looking for it, although the process touches on matters I know little about.

First, let's fix one power $d$, so that the Frobenius action will have eigenvalues of a fixed size. This enables us to compute mod $l$ for large $l$. Then, we should be able to look for an $l$-adic local system $V$ instead of a curve, say of rank $n$. This is because we can reduce $V$ mod $l$ (as usual, by way of compactness of the fundamental group $\pi_1$) to get a sheaf $V_l$. But then, the kernel of the corresponding mod $l$ $\pi_1$-representation will give a curve $f:Y \rightarrow X$. Since $V_l$ trivializes over $Y$, there is an exact sequence

$0 \rightarrow V_l \rightarrow f_*((Z/l)^n) \rightarrow M \rightarrow 0,$

with $M$ just defined as the quotient, so the $q^{d/2}$ part of $H^1(\bar{X}, V_l)$ should inject into $H^1(\bar{Y}, (Z/l)^n)$, giving you what you want.

I admit that several parts of the argument are sloppily written. It seems to me plausible to fix it all up to be rigorous.

Now, where does one get $V$ having $q^{d/2}$ inside $H^1(\bar{X}, V)$? It suffices to have $q^{-d/2}$ as a zero of the $L$-function $L(X,V, t)$. So we go searching for a rank $n$ unramified automorphic form for $K(X)$ whose $L$-function has the right property. This is where my shaky expertise starts to fail, but I've always had the impression that constructing automorphic forms over function fields was a rather accessible combinatorial matter. Perhaps real experts can now comment on whether this is at all plausible.

  • $\begingroup$ Hmm, I realized very quickly that the 'injection' portion of the argument could also be problematic in general. But I'll let the answer stand as a vague sketch of a strategy. $\endgroup$ – Minhyong Kim Apr 27 '10 at 12:02
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps one way of ensuring the injectivity would be to arrange for $Y$ to be split over some $F_{q^d}$ rational point $x$. This way, the Frobenius action on $H^0(M)\subset M_x$ becomes trivial. I presume you can encode this property of $V_l$ into the automorphic side as a requirement. $\endgroup$ – Minhyong Kim Apr 27 '10 at 13:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.