Let $X$ and $Y$ be complex Banach spaces and $B(X,Y)$ be the Banach space of all bounded operators. An operator $T\in B(X,Y)$ is weakly compact if $T(\{ x\in X;\; \| x\| \leq 1\})$ is relatively compact in the weak topology of $Y$. If $X$ or $Y$ is reflexive, then every operator in $B(X,Y)$ is weakly compact. I guess that the converse holds as well: if every operator in $B(X,Y)$ is weakly compact then either $X$ or $Y$ has to be reflexive. But I cannot find a satisfactory argument for this. I know about some characterizations of weakly compact operators: factorization through a reflexive Banach space or continuity with respect to the right topology in $X$. However it seems to me that there must be a simple argument which forces that either $X$ or $Y$ is reflexive if every operator in $B(X,Y)$ is weakly compact. I am asking if someone knows this simple argument or if there is a paper with an answer to my question.


The fact that each $T\in B(X,Y)$ is weakly compact does not imply $X$ or $Y$ reflexive. For example, every non-weakly compact operator $T:\ell_\infty\to Y$ is an isomorphism on a subspace isomorphic to $\ell_\infty$ (See Prop. 2.f.4 in Classical Banach spaces I, by Lindenstrauss ans Tzafriri).

Thus if $Y$ is a non-reflexive space containing no copy of $\ell_\infty$ (e.g. $\ell_1$, or a separable non-reflexive space) then every $T\in B(\ell_\infty,Y)$ is weakly compact.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the answer! My intuition was wrong. Now I see, why I couldn't find an answer to my question in books and papers. However, is there a known general result which says what type of spaces have to be $X$ and $Y$ if every operator in $B(X,Y)$ is weakly compact? $\endgroup$ Dec 17 '15 at 8:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I do not know a general answer; only special cases. Denoting $W(X,Y)$ the weakly compact operators, if $X$ is separable and $L(X,C[0,1])=W(X,C[0,1])$ or $L(X,\ell_\infty)=W(X,\ell_\infty)$, then $X$ is reflexive. If $X$ contains no copies of $\ell_1$ and weakly convergent sequences in $Y$ are norm convergent (like in $\ell_1$) then $B(X,Y)=W(X,Y)$. $\endgroup$ Dec 17 '15 at 9:54
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you once more for your answer and useful information. $\endgroup$ Dec 17 '15 at 10:15

I don't know if the following helps:

Let $B(X,Y) = W(X,Y)$. Then the following hold.

(i) If there exists a surjection $T\in B(X,Y)$ then $Y$ is reflexive.

(ii) If there exists an injection $T\in B(X,Y)$ with closed range then $X$ is reflexive.

Indeed, denote by $B_r$ and $K_r$ the open and closed ball around $0$, respectively. By the open mapping theorem, $TB_1$ is open. Thus, there exists $r > 0$ such that $K_r\subset TB_1\subset TK_1$, i.e., $K_r$ is weakly compact in $Y$, meaning that $Y$ is reflexive. If $T$ is an injection with closed range then a similar argument as above shows that $\operatorname{ran} T$ is reflexive. But as $T : X\to\operatorname{ran} T$ admits a bounded inverse, $X$ is reflexive.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for those results. Any new information about weakly compact operators is welcome. Although that I am not studying these operators somehow they have appeared in my research work. I am especially interested in the question when $B(X,Y)=W(X,Y)$. It seems that there is no complete answer to this question in literature. $\endgroup$ Dec 28 '15 at 12:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.