Consider the linear Schrödinger equation $i\partial_t u = -\Delta u$, where $\Delta$ is the Laplacian on the hyperbolic space $\mathbb{H}^d$. What are the admissible pairs $(p, q)$ such that we have Strichartz estimates of the form $$ \Vert u\Vert_{L^p_tL^q_x(\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{H}^d)} \leq C_{p, q}\Vert u_0\Vert_{L^2(\mathbb{H}^d)}?$$ Is the theory similar to that on $\mathbb{R}^d$? Also, If we replace the Laplacian in the above equation with the fractional Laplacian $(-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}$, where $\alpha \in (0, 2)$, do we know about the admissible pairs? This is mainly a reference request.

  • $\begingroup$ Try the scaling $x\mapsto\lambda x$, $t\mapsto\lambda^2 t$. $\endgroup$
    – Fan Zheng
    Dec 3 '15 at 18:53
  • $\begingroup$ @FanZheng Scaling would only give you the possible pairs. But it is not clear to me that the Strichartz estimates would hold for all possible pairs. $\endgroup$
    – user83608
    Dec 3 '15 at 19:12

For the standard Schroedinger, the result is due to Anker and Pierfelice http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0294144909000250 and separately Ionescu and Staffilani http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00208-009-0344-6

Their Strichartz estimate reads:

Let $u$ solve $i\partial_t u + \triangle u = F$ on $\mathbb{H}^n \times\mathbb{R}$, and let $(p^{-1}, q^{-1})$ and $(\bar{p}^{-1}, \bar{q}^{-1})$ both belong to the triangle $$ T_n = \{(x,y) \in (0,1/2]\times (0,1/2): x + ny \geq n/2\} \cup \{ (0,1/2)\} $$ then the estimate $$ \|u\|_{L^p_t L^q_x} \lesssim \|u_0\|_{L^2_x} + \|F\|_{L^{\bar{p}'}_tL^{\bar{q}'}_x} $$

Where $\prime$ denote the Holder conjugate.

  • $\begingroup$ Exactly what I wanted. One question, if I may: $\lesssim (....)$ here means $\leq C_{p, q, p', q'}(....)$. Is it known what the optimal constants $C_{p, q, p', q'}$ are and if they are attained? $\endgroup$
    – user83608
    Dec 3 '15 at 19:35
  • $\begingroup$ @user83608: that I don't know. As far as I know even the case for Euclidean space is not entirely resolved: Foschi proved for $n = 1,2$ but only estimates of the best constants are available in general ejde.math.txstate.edu/Volumes/2015/270/selvitella.pdf ; that there exists maximizers however is known [Shao, arXiv: 0809.0153]. I'll be surprised if the general hyperbolic space case is solved. $\endgroup$ Dec 3 '15 at 19:48
  • $\begingroup$ Actually, as regards the Euclidean case, there is also MR2547132. $\endgroup$
    – user83608
    Dec 3 '15 at 20:01
  • $\begingroup$ ... which has also only been successfully used to compute cases when $n = 1$ or $2$. My point is that given so much is still not known about the Euclidean case, I am doubtful whether anyone seriously looked at the best constants issue for hyperbolic space. $\endgroup$ Dec 3 '15 at 20:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.