4
$\begingroup$

I'm new in the field, so I'm sorry in advance if my question is too naive.

Let's consider $S$ a surface of genus $g\ge 2$ with an hyperbolic metric $g$. Let's call $\mathcal{S}(S)$ the set of closed geodesics on $S$ with respect to $g$.

Usually on $\mathcal{S}(S)$ there is the topology induced by the hausdorff metric (indentifying a geodesic with its image, we can view $\mathcal{S}(S)$ as a subset of $\mathcal{C}(S)$, the set of closed sets of $S$).

Lately I've stumbled upon the "$\textit{compact-open topology}$" on $\mathcal{S}(S)$: this topology has as a subbase the sets $V(K,U)$ of isometries $h:K\rightarrow U$, where $K$ is a compact subset of $\mathbb{R}$ and $U$ is an open set in $S$.

My questions are:

1) Why one should use the compact-open topology instead of the topology induced by the hausdorff metric on $\mathcal{S}(S)$? Maybe it has something to do with conververgence of sequences of geodesics?

2) When is a subset $V\subset\mathcal{S}(S)$ closed for the compact open topology?

3) Can you point me out some references to study properties of the compact open topology on $\mathcal{S}(S)$?

Thank you

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ To be precise, V(K,U) consists of maps R-->S which send K to U. $\endgroup$ – ThiKu Nov 20 '15 at 19:41
  • $\begingroup$ Probably you are aware of this, but just to mention: if S is compact, then the Arzela-Ascoli theorem implies compactness of the space of geodesics (with the K-O-topology), which is often useful. $\endgroup$ – ThiKu Nov 20 '15 at 19:48
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ It is important to note that these are topologies on different sets: The c/o topology is on the space of parameterized geodesics while the Hausdorff topology is on the space of unparameterized geodesics. Of course, there is a map from one to the other, but the sets are different. One also frequently uses the Hausdorff topology on the set of all closed subsets of $S$ so that the limit of a sequence of unparameterized geodesics is not a geodesic but a different object, say, a geodesic lamination in the context of simple geodesics. $\endgroup$ – Misha Nov 20 '15 at 19:59
  • $\begingroup$ yes, of course you're right. So I guess my question #1 becomes "which is the advantage of considering parametrized geodesics with compact open topology instead of unparametrized geodesics with hausdorff topology?" $\endgroup$ – gustav hertric Nov 20 '15 at 20:31
  • $\begingroup$ @gustavhertric isn't it tautological? A parametrized geodesic is a function with a domain. $\endgroup$ – Ryan Budney Nov 21 '15 at 21:42
1
$\begingroup$

Consider the set $\tilde{\mathcal G}(S)$ of all unit speed parametrised geodesics, closed or not. Then regard the space of closed parametrised geodesics $\tilde{\mathcal S}(S)$ as a subspace with the respective subspace topology. Denote the quotients by $\mathbb R$ as $\bar{\mathcal G}(S)$ and $\bar{\mathcal S}(S)$, so these are sets of directed geodesics. Quotienting out $\mathbb Z/2$ gives the spaces $\mathcal G(S)$ and $\mathcal S(S)$ of unparametrised, undirected geodesics. The $C^0$ topology on $\tilde{\mathcal S}(S)$ is closest in spirit to the Hausdorff topology on $\mathcal S(S)$.

In hyperbolic space $\mathbb H^2$, any two parametrised geodesics that are not reparametrisations of each other will separate. So $\tilde{\mathcal G}(\mathbb H^2)$ in the $C^0$ topology is the topological union of infinitely many copies of $\mathbb R$, one for each unparametrised, directed geodesic in $\bar{\mathcal G}(\mathbb H^2)$. You get the same behaviour for $\tilde{\mathcal G}(S)$. Similarly, the Hausdorff topology on $\mathcal G(\mathbb H^2)$ and $\mathcal S(S)$ will be discrete.

On the other hand, there is a bijection between $\tilde{\mathcal G}(S)$ and the unit tangent bundle of $S$, were a unit speed geodesic $c$ is mapped to $\dot c(0)$. With respect to the compact-open topology, this is a homeomorphism.

This should answer 1) and 2). For 3), try a textbook on Riemannian geometry that includes a chapter on the geodesic flow.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ thank you. Is there a book in particular which you recommend? $\endgroup$ – gustav hertric Nov 23 '15 at 15:16
  • $\begingroup$ I learned a lot of stuff from a German book called "Riemannsche Geometrie im Großen" by Gromoll, Klingenberg and Meyer. I am afraid I don't know of an English translation. $\endgroup$ – Sebastian Goette Nov 23 '15 at 16:37
  • $\begingroup$ Another hint: Because the target space is a metric space, convergence in the compact open topology is the same as compact convergence,see [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact-open_topology]. Maybe this helps to find sources. $\endgroup$ – Sebastian Goette Nov 23 '15 at 16:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.