5
$\begingroup$

Is it possible to classify explicitly compact 2-dimensional Alexandrov spaces with curvature bounded below (either with or without boundary)?

If yes, a reference would be helpful.

EDIT: If the question is too general, may be one can classify somehow non-negatively curved compact 2-dimensional Alexandrov spaces, e.g. as pieces of convex surfaces (see my comment below). In general I would be interested to know as precise result as possible.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Classify up to what? isometry? $\endgroup$ – ThiKu Nov 13 '15 at 7:35
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. For example all non-negatively curved metrics on the 2-sphere can be realized as convex (possibly degenerate) surfaces in Euclidean 3-space (Alexandrov's theorem). May be in general there is no such a nice description. Then I am asking on the most precise result available. $\endgroup$ – MKO Nov 13 '15 at 7:54
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ You can get something local in the same vein : if $X$ is an alexandrov surface with curvature $\geq\kappa$, then every point of $X$ has a neighborhood isometric ta a small piece of the boundary of a convex subset in the space form of dimension 3 and curvature $\kappa$. $\endgroup$ – Thomas Richard Nov 13 '15 at 13:08
5
$\begingroup$

Applying doubling theorem, we can get rid of boundary. Then pass to the universal cover. The obtained space is isometric to convex surface in the model space with curvature $\kappa$ and any motion of your original space can be extended as a motion of this surface.

So your space is a quotient of convex surface by a discrete group of motions of the model space. In particular, if your space had a boundary it will be lifted to plane curves in the model space.

In general, the surface is not unique (up to congruence), so it is not exactly a classification, but close.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ 1) The universal cover may not be compact. Can it still be realized as convex surface in the model space? 2) If one has a convex closed surface in the model space, and one chooses a domain with nice boundary in it, under what conditions the closure of the domain is an Alexandrov space with curvature bounded below? This is necessary to describe Alexandrov 2-spaces with boundary. $\endgroup$ – MKO Nov 14 '15 at 8:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @sva (1) Right, it can be noncompact, but still it can be realized as a convex surface, the proof by approximation by closed surfaces. (2) It has to be bounded by curve with positive turn, but as I said, to describe the surface you may assume that it bounded by a plane curve (this is the plane of reflection which preserves your surface). $\endgroup$ – Anton Petrunin Nov 14 '15 at 13:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.