Let $K, K'$ be knots in $S^3$, and $T, T'$ the boundaries of their tubular neighborhoods.

Recall that by theorems of Waldhausen, and Gordon and Luecke, one knows the following: an isomorphism $[\pi_1(T) \to \pi_1(S^3 \setminus K)] \cong [(\pi_1(T') \to \pi_1(S^3 \setminus K')]$ implies that $K$ and $K'$ are isotopic.

Suppose the category of linear representations of $[\pi_1(T) \to \pi_1(S^3 \setminus K)]$ is equivalent to the category of linear representations of $[\pi_1(T') \to \pi_1(S^3 \setminus K')]$. Are $K$ and $K'$ isotopic?

$$ $$

Note: In a previous version of this question, I asked whether this is possible if you interpret the category above as a tensor category; in the comments it is pointed out that then, yes, at least if you allow big representations. But, now I realize that in fact I don't have the tensor product structure.

  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by linear representations of a morphism of groups? $\endgroup$ – Qiaochu Yuan Nov 7 '15 at 0:14
  • $\begingroup$ representation of one, representation of the other, morphism between them compatible with the map of groups. $\endgroup$ – Vivek Shende Nov 7 '15 at 0:40
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Do you allow infinite-dimensional representations? If so, the answer should be trivially yes, since if you allow infinite dimensional representations, a (possibly infinite) discrete group $G$ is the group of symmetric monoidal endomorphisms of the unique (up to isomorphism) symmetric monoidal exact functor $\mathrm{Rep}_{\mathbb C}(G) \to \mathrm{Vect}_{\mathbb C}$, and homomorphisms $G \to H$ are uniquely determined by the corresponding symmetric monoidal functors $\mathrm{Rep}_{\mathbb C}(H) \to \mathrm{Rep}_{\mathbb C}(G)$. $\endgroup$ – Theo Johnson-Freyd Nov 7 '15 at 1:59
  • $\begingroup$ If the knot is hyperbolic then the hyperbolic representation is faithful, so maybe infinite-dimensional representations aren't needed, at least for hyperbolic knots. $\endgroup$ – Peter Samuelson Nov 7 '15 at 2:14
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Every knot group admits a faithful finite-dimensional representation. Over the integers this is a theorem of Przytycki--Wise, though I have a feeling that over the reals it was proved by Kronheimer--Mrowka. $\endgroup$ – HJRW Nov 7 '15 at 5:57

So long as I allow myself infinite size representations, and writing $\mathbb{Z}[G]-mod$ for representations of $G$ in $\mathbb{Z}$-modules, then so long as I have the forgetful functor

$$\mathbb{Z}[G]-mod \to \mathbb{Z}-mod$$

I can recover $\mathbb{Z}[G]$ as endomorphisms of this functor.

In general, one cannot recover $G$ even from $\mathbb{Z}[G]$, even for finite groups $G$.

However, as it turns out, knot groups are known to be left orderable, and it is known that for left orderable groups, the only units in $\mathbb{Z}[G]$ are the obvious ones, from which $G$ can be recovered.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.