2
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a projective surface over $\mathbb{C}$, let $x\in X$ be the only singular point of $X$. Let $L$ be an ample line bundle on $X$. Consider the blow up $Y$ of $X$ along $x$, $f:Y\longrightarrow X$. Let $L'$ be the pull back of $L$ to $Y$ and let $E$ be the exceptional divisor.

We have the following short exact sequence on $Y$,

$0\longrightarrow L'-E\longrightarrow L'\longrightarrow L'|_E\longrightarrow 0$.

So there is an injection $|L'-E|\hookrightarrow |L'|$ which sends $C\mapsto C+E$.

1) Now how do we describe curves in $|L'-E|$? Are these curves that contain $E$ or curves that pass through a point in $E$? Do they have to intersect $E$?

2) What does the divisor $C+E$ mean? The divisor $C+E$ comes from $X$ which passes through $x$?

3) Is $C$ is a closed subscheme of $C+E$. Then we have the surjection $\mathcal{O}_{C+E} \longrightarrow \mathcal{O}_{C}$. What is the ideal sheaf? It looks to me to be $\mathcal{O}_E$.

4) If $C$ is indeed a closed subscheme of $C+E$, and we start with a line bundle $A$ on $C+E$, and call the pullback to $C$ as $A'$, the degrees will be same I suppose. But what is the relationship between $h^0(C,A')$ and $h^0(C+E,A)$?

Sorry about the long post. These questions have been bothering me for a while. Thanks in advance!

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ 1) Note that when you blow up a point $x$, the sheaf $\pi^*I_x$ is locally free - corresponding to the locally free sheaf $O(-mE)$ where $m$ is the multiplicity of the point. So sections of $O(L'-E)=\pi^*L\otimes O(-E)=\pi^*L\otimes \pi^*I_x$ correspond to sections of $L$ vanishing along $x$. In other words, the linear system $|L'-E|$ corresponds to (strict transforms of) curves of $|L|$ passing though $x$. $\endgroup$ – Walter Neff Oct 30 '15 at 17:23
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ 2) $C-E$, as a divisor, is not effective (it has a negative coefficient). It might however still be linearly equivalent to one, say $D$, with non-negative coefficients. In that case $D\in |O(C-E)|$ corresponds, as above to a curve passing through $x$. 3),4) If $C$ is a curve (irreducible!) then $C-E$ is not a subscheme of $C$. The only way one can make sense of these statements is in the case when $C$ itself is a reducible divisor, and $E$ is one of the components. Then some $C-mE$ could mean the divisor corresponding to the other components of $C$. $\endgroup$ – Walter Neff Oct 30 '15 at 17:23
  • $\begingroup$ @WalterNeff, I had one more doubt, the linear system $|L'-E|$ is basepoint free right even though the corresponding curves in $|L|$ have $x$ as a base point.? $\endgroup$ – gradstudent Nov 3 '15 at 12:55
1
$\begingroup$

In the following I suppose that by "curve" in a linear system you mean "effective divisor" vithout any claim about being irreducible and/or reduced.

1) Curves in |L'| are exactly the pull-back of curves in |L|. So "curves" in |L'-E| are obtained by pulling-back curves in L through x, and then remove $E$ with multiplicity 1. That's usually the strict transform, but may contain $E$ if the curve in $|L|$ passes through $x$ with high multiplicity.

2) $C+E$ is the reducible effective divisor union of $C$ and $E$ (of course) and equals the pull-back on $Y$ of the image of $C$ o $X$. In other words you get all pull-backs of curves in $|L|$ passing through $x$.

3) No, it is ${\mathcal O}_E(-C)$, its sections are supported on $E$ but vanish on the intersection with $C$.

4) No, the degree do not need to be the same. Assume for instance that $C$ is smooth irreducible intersecting transversally $E$ in $d$ points. Then every pair of line bundles on $C$ and $E$ may be "glued" to a line bundle on $C+E$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks @Roberto Pignatelli! I had one more doubt, the linear system $|L'-E|$ is basepoint free right even though the corresponding curves in $|L|$ have $x$ as a base point.? $\endgroup$ – gradstudent Nov 3 '15 at 12:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Usually yes. But, as you are only supposing that $L$ be ample, it can be very small. I can construct examples where $|L'-E|$ is a single divisor, and then you get a lot of fixed points. $\endgroup$ – Roberto Pignatelli Nov 3 '15 at 17:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Only if $CE=1$. In this case, as you assume that $C$ does not contain $E$, $C$ intersects $E$ transversally in a smooth point of $C$, and then by transversality the curve $C'$ remains smooth in the image of that point. $\endgroup$ – Roberto Pignatelli Nov 8 '15 at 17:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If $CE \geq 2$, on the contrary, $C'$ will be singular. If for example $C$ and $E$ intersect in two or more points, all those points will map to the same point of $X$, which will be then singular for $C'$. But even if they intersect only in one point, as the intersection will not be transversal, $C'$ will have a cusp there. $\endgroup$ – Roberto Pignatelli Nov 8 '15 at 17:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No. Set $X$ the quadric cone in ${\mathbb P}^3$, $L={\mathcal O}_X(1)$. Then $Y$ is the Hirzebrich surface ${\mathbb F}_2$, $E$ is a rational curve with self intersection $(-2)$. You can pick as $C'$ an hyperplane section through the node $x$, two lines intersecting in $x$. Then $C$ is the union of two lines of the ruling of ${\mathbb F}_2$, each intersecting $E$ tranversally in a different point, so $CE=2$. The proper transform of $C'$ is in this case $C+E$. $\endgroup$ – Roberto Pignatelli Nov 8 '15 at 18:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.