1
$\begingroup$

Let $u: \mathbb{R}_+ \times \mathbb{R}^d$ be a bounded $C^2$ function whose first and second partial derivatives are uniformly bounded (or, more generally, have at most polynomial growth as $|x| \to \infty)$ on $[0, T] \times \mathbb{R}^d$, for any $0 \le T < \infty$. For any $t \ge 0$ and any $x \in \mathbb{R}^d$ it is not hard to see that,$$E^x u(t, W_t) = u(0, x) + E^x \int_0^y \left( {\partial\over{\partial s}} + {1\over2}\Delta_s\right) u(s, W_s)\,ds.$$

I don't see why this equality is true? Could anyone explain?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Where have you seen this assertion? $\endgroup$
    – Stefan Kohl
    Commented Oct 22, 2015 at 19:40
  • $\begingroup$ What is $W_t$ and what is $\Delta_s$? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 22, 2015 at 20:29

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

This a simple consequence of Itô formula in stochastic calculus. I'll explain the one dimensional formula, the d-dimensional is similar.

First of all to answer the questions of Stefan and Wilie, $W_t$ is a Brownian motion process which takes the value $x$ at $t=0$ so the dependence of $x$ is implicit here, most of the references will consider $W_t$ a standard Brownian motion which means it takes the value $0$ at $t=0$ and in the above formula you'll have $x+W_t$ instead. $\Delta_s$ here means the sum of all the mixed derivatives.

Itô formula states that $$du(s,W_s)=\frac{\partial u}{\partial s}(s,W_s)ds+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}(s,W_s)dW_s+\frac 12\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial s^2}(s,W_s)ds $$

Integrating this equation between $0$ and $t$ gives

$$u(t,W_t)=u(0,W_0)+\int_0^t\frac{\partial u}{\partial s}(s,W_s)ds+\int_0^t\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}(s,W_s)dW_s+\int_0^t\frac12\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial s^2}(s,W_s)ds $$

now taking the expactation $E^x$ which means the conditional expactation knowing that $W_0=x$ we get the results as we have $$ E^x[\int_0^t\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}(s,W_s)dW_s]=0$$

by the way, you have a typo in your formula where you wrote $y$ instead of $t$.

All the conditions about the polynomial growth are made just to make the expectations converge. Hope this is clear.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Where did the ${1\over2}$ go? $\endgroup$
    – Wenliang
    Commented Oct 22, 2015 at 22:19
  • $\begingroup$ I was correcting the formula in the same time you posted your comment :) $\endgroup$
    – Hicham
    Commented Oct 22, 2015 at 22:20

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .