12
$\begingroup$

The literature has definitions (seemingly plural, though they might be linked) of a $q$-deformed Virasoro algebra. But is there any link of these to a $q$-deformed Heisenberg algebra? (Classically there is an expression for $L_n$ in terms of a normal ordered quadratic in the generators of the Heisenberg algebra.) I would be grateful for a reference to somewhere that discusses this in terms understandable to a non-expert in conformal field theory. However anything to shed light on the current status of the q-Virasoro and q-Heisenberg algebras, or relates them to the undeformed theory, would be of interest.

Apologies for my ignorance on this subject, as I pointed out I am certainly not an expert in CFT. I am currently trying to sort this out as an example of the action of vector fields in noncommutative geometry...

$\endgroup$
6
+100
$\begingroup$

The main sources are Awata et al or Frenkel-Reshetikhin. In http://arxiv.org/pdf/q-alg/9507034v5.pdf section 4, you can see the q,t case. You can also look at http://arxiv.org/pdf/q-alg/9505025v1.pdf where the introduction gives more references to how this relates to the undeformed case. This gives the classical Virasoro as functions on opers on the punctured disc.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks - the second reference is useful. Is there a more symmetric formalism for the deformed virasoro in this reference? It would be easier to see how it relates to other possible definitions. $\endgroup$ – Edwin Beggs Oct 9 '15 at 11:40
  • $\begingroup$ In particular, there seems to be no reference to $s_{n+m}$ in the commutator of $\{s_n,s_m\}$. $\endgroup$ – Edwin Beggs Oct 9 '15 at 12:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.