5
$\begingroup$

A sequence $(x_{n})_{n}$ in a Banach space $X$ is said to be unconditionally $p$-summable if $$\sup_{x^{*}\in B_{X^{*}}}\Bigl(\sum_{n=m}^{\infty}\lvert\langle x^{*},x_{n}\rangle\rvert^{p}\Bigr)^{1/p}\rightarrow 0\qquad(m\rightarrow \infty).$$ We say that an operator $T:X\rightarrow Y$ is unconditionally $p$-summing if $(Tx_{n})_{n}$ is unconditionally $p$-summable in $Y$ whenever $(x_{n})_{n}$ is weakly $p$-summable in $X$. We can prove that $T$ is unconditionally $p$-summing whenever $T^{**}$ is unconditionally $p$-summing. Is the converse true?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ It is usual for people to add one of the "top-level" tags like fa.functional-analysis, or you can use the tag banach-spaces. $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Commented Sep 20, 2015 at 0:47
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Yes! If you want to use MO, please use it properly. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 20, 2015 at 3:39
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your advice, Yemon. I'll use the tag banach-sapces later. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 20, 2015 at 16:19

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

The answer is no. Bourgain and Delbaen constructed a Banach space $X$ that has the Schur property and $X^{**}$ is isomorphically universal for separable Banach space (it is even isomorphic to the the second dual of $C[0,1]$). Every operator from $\ell_p$, $1<p<\infty$, and from $c_0$ into $X$ is thus compact, so that every operator with domain $X$ is unconditionally $p$-summing for all $1\le p < \infty$. But the second adjoint of the identity operator on $X$ is not unconditionally $p$-summing for any $1\le p < \infty$ because it is an isomorphism on copies of $\ell_p$ for all $p$.

Bourgain, J.; Delbaen, F. A class of special $L_\infty$ spaces. Acta Math. 145 (1980), no. 3-4, 155–176.

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Typo in second sentence, unless Anthony Bourdain has branched out even further... $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Commented Sep 20, 2015 at 20:16
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Thanks, Yemon. Jean is better at cooking than Anthony is at math, but only marginally so. :) $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 20, 2015 at 20:46
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, Bill. If $X$ is a Banach space such that $X^{*}$ does not contain isomorphic copy of $l_{1}$, is any operator from $c_{0}$ to $X^{*}$ compact? At least, this is true for $X=c_{0},l_{p}(1<p<\infty)$. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 21, 2015 at 0:14
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. If $Y$ does not contain an isomorphic copy of $c_0$, then every operator from $c_0$ to $Y$ is compact. But if $X^*$ contains a copy of $c_0$, then $X$ contains a complemented copy of $\ell_1$ (an old result of Pelczynski that is in standard textbooks; probably Albiac-Kalton has this). $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 21, 2015 at 0:35
  • $\begingroup$ "$X^{*}$ does not contain a copy of $l_{1}$" should be corrected to be "$X$ does not contain a copy of $l_{1}$". $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 21, 2015 at 14:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.