Suppose $X$ is a complex manifold.

If $X$ is Kähler, the cohomology groups decompose into subgroups represented by $(p,q)$-forms.

If $X$ is not Kähler, I think the decomposition may not hold?

Is there an example where we have a nonzero class be represented by both a $(p,q)$-form and a $(p',q')$-form with $(p, q) \neq (p',q')$?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If I am not being silly, I think $\frac{1}{z} dz$ and $\frac{1}{\overline{z}} d\overline{z}$ both represent generators of $H^1(X)$, where $X$ is the plane with the origin deleted? Did you want $X$ compact as well? $\endgroup$ – Steven Gubkin Sep 9 '15 at 3:33
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, compact complex manifold. $\endgroup$ – Qixiao Sep 9 '15 at 5:09
  • $\begingroup$ It seems that this answers your question: mathoverflow.net/a/95377/1106 $\endgroup$ – Steven Gubkin Sep 9 '15 at 5:12
  • $\begingroup$ Do you want harmonic forms for some Hermitian metric? Perhaps for a Gauduchon metric? Michael Albanese's examples are not harmonic, so you can't really see the difference between Kaehler and non-Kaehler manifolds. $\endgroup$ – Ben McKay Aug 2 '16 at 20:06

I think you want an example of a compact complex manifold $X$ and differential forms $\gamma \in \mathcal{E}^{p,q}(X)$ and $\gamma'\in \mathcal{E}^{p',q'}(X)$ with $(p',q') \neq (p, q)$ such that $[\gamma] = [\gamma']$ in de Rham cohomology.

Let $X$ be a compact complex three-dimensional manifold with a non-closed holomorphic one-form $\alpha$, i.e. $\alpha \in \mathcal{E}^{1,0}(X)$ such that $\overline{\partial}\alpha = 0$, but $d\alpha = \partial\alpha \neq 0$. An example of such a manifold is the Iwasawa manifold, see below for details.

Let $\gamma = \partial\alpha \in \mathcal{E}^{2,0}(X)$ and $\gamma' = \overline{\gamma} \in \mathcal{E}^{0,2}(X)$. Note that

$$d\gamma = \partial\gamma + \overline{\partial}\gamma = \partial\partial\alpha + \overline{\partial}\partial\alpha = -\partial\overline{\partial}\alpha = 0$$

and $d\gamma' = d\overline{\gamma} = \overline{d\gamma} = 0$, so $\gamma$ and $\gamma'$ define de Rham cohomology classes $[\gamma], [\gamma'] \in H^2_{\text{dR}}(X, \mathbb{C})$ which satisfy

$$[\gamma] = [\partial\alpha] = [d\alpha] = 0 = [d\bar{\alpha}] = [\overline{d\alpha}] = [\overline{\partial\alpha}] = [\overline{\gamma}] = [\gamma'].$$

This is somewhat unsatisfying. It would be interesting to see an example where $[\gamma] = [\gamma'] \neq 0$, but I have not been able to construct one yet.

On a compact Kähler manifold, every holomorphic form is closed. Without the Kähler hypothesis, one can still show that on a compact complex $n$-dimensional manifold, every holomorphic $(n-1)$-form is closed. Therefore, the first possible example of a non-closed holomorphic form is a holomorphic one-form on a three-dimensional compact complex manifold. Such examples exist.

Let $R$ be a commutative ring with identity. The three-dimensional Heisenberg group over $R$ is

$$\mathbb{H}(3, R) = \left\{\begin{bmatrix} 1 & z^1 & z^3\\ 0 & 1 & z^2\\ 0 & 0 & 1\end{bmatrix} : z^1, z^2, z^3 \in R\right\}.$$

The Iwasawa manifold $\mathbb{I}_3$ is the quotient of $\mathbb{H}(3, \mathbb{C})$ by the discrete subgroup $\mathbb{H}(3, \mathbb{Z}[i])$ acting on the left, i.e. $\mathbb{I}_3 := \mathbb{H}(3, \mathbb{Z}[i])\setminus\mathbb{H}(3, \mathbb{C})$. More precisely, for $A \in \mathbb{H}(3, \mathbb{Z}[i])$, $\gamma_A : \mathbb{H}(3, \mathbb{C}) \to \mathbb{H}(3, \mathbb{C})$ given by $\gamma_A(M) = AM$ is a biholomorphism and $\Gamma = \{\gamma_A \mid A \in \mathbb{H}(3, \mathbb{Z}[i])\}$ acts properly discontinuously on $\mathbb{H}(3, \mathbb{C})$, so the quotient $\mathbb{I}_3$ is a complex manifold. Moreover, the quotient is compact.


$$A = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & w^1 & w^3\\ 0 & 1 & w^2\\ 0 & 0 & 1\end{bmatrix} \in \mathbb{H}(3, \mathbb{Z}[i]).$$

The differential forms $dz^1$, $dz^2$, and $dz^3-z^1dz^2$ on $\mathbb{H}(3, \mathbb{C})$ form a basis of holomorphic one-forms. As

$$\gamma_A^*(dz^1) = d(z^1 + w^1) = dz^1,$$

$$\gamma_A^*(dz^2) = d(z^2 + w^2) = dz^2,$$


\begin{align*} \gamma_A^*(dz^3-z^1dz^2) &= d(z^3 + w^1z^2 + w^3) - (z^1 + w^1)d(z^2 + w^2)\\ &= dz^3 + w^1dz^2 - z^1dz^2 - w^1dz^2\\ &= dz^3 - z^1dz^2, \end{align*}

the forms $dz^1, dz^2, dz^3-z^1dz^2$ are left-invariant, so they descend to holomorphic one-forms $\alpha^1, \alpha^2, \alpha^3$ on $\mathbb{I}_3$. As $dz^1$ and $dz^2$ are closed, $\alpha^1$ and $\alpha^2$ are closed. However,

$$d(dz^3 - z^1dz^2) = -dz^1\wedge dz^2$$

so $d\alpha^3 = -\alpha^1\wedge\alpha^2 \neq 0$. Therefore $\alpha^3$ is a holomorphic one-form which is not closed.

One can deduce a few more things about $\mathbb{I}_3$ from the above. First of all, the forms $\alpha^1, \alpha^2, \alpha^3$ form a basis for the holomorphic one-forms on $\mathbb{I}_3$, so $h^{1,0}(\mathbb{I}_3) = 3$. Secondly, as $\mathbb{I}_3$ admits a holomorphic form which is not closed, it cannot admit a Kähler metric.


This is meant as a supplement to Michael's answer above. Here is an example of a compact complex threefold $X$ and two forms $\gamma_1 \in \mathcal{E}^{p,q}$ and $\gamma_2 \in \mathcal{E}^{p',q'}$ such that $(p,q) \neq (p',q')$ and $[\gamma_1] = [\gamma_2] \in H_{dR}^2(X)$, but also $[\gamma_1] \neq 0$. This will make use of results found in Cordero, Fernández, Gray, The Frölicher spectral sequence for compact nilmanifolds.

Applying Theorem 6 in this paper gives us that there exists a simply connected 6-dimensional real Lie group with a left-invariant complex structure whose left-invariant $(1,0)$-forms are spanned by $\omega_1, \omega_2, \omega_3$ and whose left-invariant $(0,1)$-forms are spanned by $\bar \omega_1, \bar \omega_2, \bar \omega_3$, with structure equations given by \begin{align*} d\omega_1 &= 0, \ d\bar \omega_1 = 0, \\ d\omega_2 &= 0, \ d\bar \omega_2 = 0, \\ d\omega_3 &= \omega_1\omega_2 - \bar \omega_1 \omega_2, \ d\bar \omega_3 = \bar \omega_1 \bar \omega_2 - \omega_1 \bar \omega_2. \end{align*} Since the (dual) structure constants are rational, a theorem of Malcev (see Corollary 8 in the paper) tells us that there exists a discrete subgroup $\Gamma$ in $G$ such that $\Gamma \backslash G$ is a closed 6-manifold. The forms $\omega_i$ and $\bar \omega_i$ descend to $\Gamma \backslash G$ along with the complex structure on $G$. A theorem of Nomizu (referenced in this context in Hasegawa, Minimal models of nilmanifolds at the end of Section 1) tells us that the de Rham cohomology of $\Gamma \backslash G$ is isomorphic to to the cohomology of the differential graded algebra generated in degree one by $\{\omega_1, \omega_2, \omega_3, \bar \omega_1, \bar \omega_2, \bar \omega_3\}$ with the differential $d$ prescribed above.

Now, take the $(2,0)$-form $\omega_1\omega_2$ and the $(1,1)$-form $\bar \omega_1 \omega_2$. Note that they are both closed, and their difference is $d$-exact (since $d\omega_3 = \omega_1\omega_2 - \bar \omega_1 \omega_2$). So, $[\omega_1\omega_2] = [\bar \omega_1 \omega_2]$ in de Rham cohomology. We see that $\omega_1\omega_2$ is not in the image of $d$, that is $[\omega_1\omega_2] \neq 0$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.