I stumbled over the following question:

First, let me give the basic definition of a symplectic group action: Let $(M, \omega)$ be a symplectic manifold and $G$ a Lie group. A smooth action $\Phi:G \times M \rightarrow M$ is symplectic if each $\Phi_g$ is a symplectomorphism, i.e. $\Phi_g^* \omega = \omega.$

Now, it is clear that if $\Phi$ is symplectic, then the Lie derivative $L_{\phi_\chi} \omega =0$ for all $ \chi \in \mathfrak{g},$ where $\phi_{\chi}(x) = \frac{d}{dt}|_{t=0} \Phi_{e^{t \chi}}(x)$ are called the infinitesimal generators.

This is easy to see as $L_{\phi_{\chi}}(\omega) = \frac{d}{dt}|_{t=0} (\Phi_{e^{t \chi}})^* \omega = 0 $ by definition.

What is a priori unclear to me is whether this ($L_{\phi_\chi} \omega =0$ for all $ \chi \in \mathfrak{g}$) is already sufficient to conclude that $\Phi$ is a symplectic group action.

Does anybody know when (maybe under which additional conditions) this is the case?

I should say that I stumbled over this when reading this book, where it is called the infinitesimal version of this equation:

read the reference on google books.

But maybe the term "infinitesimal version" has a different meaning in symplectic geometry and it is not in general possible to go back to the "global version."

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Is $G$ connected? (I assume it is.) $\endgroup$ – Jason Starr Jul 26 '15 at 18:21
  • $\begingroup$ @JasonStarr could you explain why this property does it (maybe in an answer), because even then the exponential map is not necessarily onto? $\endgroup$ – Zlatan12 Jul 26 '15 at 18:29
  • $\begingroup$ I am not saying that connectedness is sufficient. I am saying that connectedness is necessary. $\endgroup$ – Jason Starr Jul 26 '15 at 18:33
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ For a connected LIe group, this is really a standard argument in Lie theory since any neighbourhood of the identity generates the connected component of the identity. In the nonconnected case you can not say anything reasonable: think of a discrete Lie group with non-symplectic group action... $\endgroup$ – Stefan Waldmann Jul 27 '15 at 6:16

I think it is sufficient to assume that $G$ is a connected Lie group. It is not necessary to assume that the exponential map is surjective (intuitively because one can follow broken one-parameter groups).

In fact, the set $H$ consisting of all $g\in G$ such that $\Phi_g^*\omega=\omega$ is a closed subgroup of $G$. A closed subgroup of a Lie group is a Lie group with the induced topology. What is the Lie algebra of $H$? The assumption that implies that the Lie algebra of $H$ equals the Lie algebra of $G$. In case $G$ is connected, this implies that $H=G$.

Edit: Another way to think, perhaps more elementary. $H$ is an (abstract) group. The assumption that $L_{\phi_\chi}(\omega)=0$ for all $\chi\in\mathfrak g$ implies that $H$ contains a neighborhood of the identity, and $G$ (if connected) is generated by any neighborhood of the identity.

To see that $H$ contains a neighborhood of the identity, one uses that the exponential map is onto a neighborhood of the identity and computes that (denote $\varphi_t=\Phi_{e^{t\chi}}$):


for all $s\in\mathbb R$, so $\varphi_t^*\omega=\omega$ for all $t\in\mathbb R$.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.