Let $K$ be a number field, $\rho\colon \mathrm{Gal}_K\to \mathrm{GL}_n(\overline{\mathbf{Q}_p})$ a geometric (i.e.: unramified a.e., de Rham above $p$) irreducible Galois representation. One piece of the global Langlands conjectures is that there exists a cuspidal automorphic representation $\pi$ of $\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbf{A}_K)$ such that (up to a twist) the Satake parameters of $\pi$ correspond with the Frobenius eigenvalues of $\rho$ at the unramified places.

Even better, for each $v\nmid p$, we can associate to the local Galois representation $\rho_v\colon \mathrm{Gal}_{K_v}\to \mathrm{GL}_n(\overline{\mathbf{Q}_p})$ a representation $\pi_v$ of $\mathrm{GL}_n(K_v)$ via the local Langlands correspondence. The restricted tensor product $\pi^p=\bigotimes_{v\nmid p}' \pi_v$ is a representation of $\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbf{A}_{K,f}^p)$ (finite adeles away from $p$), and by multiplicity one theorems, is the away-from-$p$ part of at most one automorphic representation. Call it $\pi$, if it exists.

Question: how does one "read off" the expected $\pi_\infty$ from $\rho$? In other words, how does one see the infinity-type of the expected automorphic representation on the Galois side?

Surely $\rho_\infty\colon \mathrm{Gal}_{K_\infty}\to \mathrm{GL}_n(\overline{\mathbf{Q}_p})$ does not "know" $\pi_\infty$. For example, when $K=\mathbf{Q}$ and $n=2$, $\rho_\infty$ only knows the "parity" of $\pi_\infty$.


1 Answer 1


Given $\pi$, Langlands' philosophy in its original form would predict the existence of a representation $\sigma$ from the (conjectural) global Langlands group of $\mathbf{Q}$ to $GL(n,\mathbf{C})$. For this representation there is "perfect local-global" -- the local behaviour of $\pi$ at a place $v$ (finite or infinite) should be related to the local behaviour of $\sigma$ at $v$ via the local Langlands correspondence.

As you've spotted though, things aren't quite the same with $\rho$ and $\pi$ because the symmetry is broken. $\pi$ is a representation over the complexes, and $\rho$ is a representation over the $p$-adics. So the first thing you have to do is to choose embeddings of $\overline{\mathbf{Q}}$ into $\mathbf{C}$ and $\overline{\mathbf{Q}}_p$. If you were working with a general number field you would now have set up some sort of weird correspondence between the places of the field above $p$ and the places above infinity, and there is some interplay in the local-global story with these places.

You have base field $\mathbf{Q}$ so the interplay is between $p$ and $\infty$. Basically, the behaviour of $\pi$ at both $p$ and $\infty$ should be determined by the behaviour of $\rho$ at both $p$ and $\infty$, but as you have spotted it is not the case that the behaviour of one of these things at $p$ is determined by the other one, and the same for infinity; you have to treat both places at once.

The answer to your question is that the Langlands parameter for $\pi_\infty$ can be read off from the Hodge--Tate weights of $\rho$ plus the behaviour of complex conjugation. The infinitesimal character of $\pi_\infty$ is the Hodge--Tate cocharacter of $\rho$, for example.

All the details can be found in



Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.