7
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a bounded random variable with $\mathbb{E}X=0$. Since $X$ is bounded, all its moments exist. Let $\mathcal{G}$ be any $\sigma$-field and let $Y:=\mathbb{E}[X|\mathcal{G}].$ I am interested in proving the following inequality relating even moments of $X$ with even moments of $Y:$

For non-negative integers $i<j,$ we have $$\mathbb{E}X^{2i}\cdot\mathbb{E}Y^{2j}\leq \mathbb{E}X^{2j}\cdot\mathbb{E}Y^{2i}.$$

Some special cases:

a) If $i=0,$ then this follows from Jensen’s inequality.

b) If $X$ is equiprobable on $\{-1,+1\},$ then this follows from the fact that $|Y|\leq 1$ almost surely.

Intuitively, I expect this to be true because $Y$ is a smoothed version of $X.$

Does the inequality follow easily from some known results? If not, what tools might help me prove it?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Just a comment: I believe your inequality should hold if and only if the following discrete version holds. Let $(b_k)_{1\le k\le N}$ and $(c_{k,l})_{1\le k,l\le N}$ satisfy $\sum b_k=0$ and $\sum_l c_{k,l}=0$ for each $k$. Then the discrete version is $\sum_{k,l} (b_k+c_{k,l})^{2i}\sum_k b_k^{2j}\le \sum_{k,l}(b_k+c_{k,l})^{2j}\sum_k b_k^{2i}$. $\endgroup$ Jul 7 '15 at 7:15
  • $\begingroup$ One more comment: there is no need to assume that $X$ is of expectation 0: if $X$ is a random variable with arbitrary expectation, then let $Z$ be a random variable that is $\pm 1$ with equal probabilities (independent of $X$) and let $\tilde X=ZX$ and $\tilde Y=ZY$; and $\tilde {\mathcal G}=\mathcal G\vee \mathcal P_Z$. Then $\mathbb E(\tilde X|\tilde G)=\tilde Y$ and $\mathbb E(\tilde X)=0$. Now the inequality for $\tilde X$ and $\tilde Y$ implies the inequality for $X$ and $Y$. $\endgroup$ Jul 7 '15 at 14:30
4
$\begingroup$

So I think this is false. I want to consider the case $i=1$, $j=\infty$ first. Let $Y$ take values in $\{\pm 1,\pm\frac 12\}$ with equal probability of $\frac 14$ each. Now let $X$ take values $\pm 1$ with probability $\frac 14$ each and $\pm \frac 34,\pm\frac 14$ with probability $\frac 18$ each. The $\sigma$-algebra is $\mathcal G=\{\{X=1\},\{X=-1\},\{X\in \{\frac 14,\frac 34\},\{X\in -\frac 14,-\frac 34\}\}$ so that $\mathbb E(X|\mathcal G)=Y$.

Now we have $\mathbb EX^{2i}\mathbb EY^{2j}=\frac 12\mathbb EX^2$ while the right side is $\frac 12\mathbb EY^2$ so that the inequality goes in the opposite direction. However $\mathbb EX^{2j}$ and $\mathbb EY^{2j}$ converge to $\frac 12$ as $j\to\infty$, so that the wrong inequality persists for finite $j$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Anthony. You're right. This is a bummer for me, I will try to post another conjecture which will help me prove what I want to. $\endgroup$
    – Hedonist
    Jul 7 '15 at 16:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.