When is the boundary of an open planar set a Jordan curve? 
Is the boundary of an open, regular, bounded, path-connected, and simply connected set a Jordan curve?

Trying to find weakest condition on an open bounded set to apply Carathéodory's theorem. 
My bounded open sets can be assumed to be pretty well-behaved, but I wonder if the above conditions are sufficient. 
 A: This was addressed in a recent paper of R.L. Moore:
A Characterization of Jordan Regions by Properties Having no Reference to their Boundaries
Robert L. Moore
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Vol. 4, No. 12 (Dec. 15, 1918), pp. 364-370

A: The two answers already posted show that there are plenty of counterexamples (it ought to be a $G_\delta$ set in a suitable hyperspace), I just thought one might also consider the Warsow circle (or rather its "inside" which could easily be defined even if this continuum is not a Jordan curve) as a specfic (easy) counterexample that perhaps first comes to mind. Though I do not know what "regular" means in this context, is it that $U=\mathrm{Int}\ \overline U$ ? Or is it as in PDE that boundary points must be regular ? Or is it, as in this paper that the boundary is a "closed, embedded, codimension-$1$ smooth submanifold (without boundary) which is the common topological boundary of the open sets ..." ?  

A: No, the boundary of an open, regular, bounded, path-connected, and simply connected set in $\mathbb R^2$ can be quite complicated. It might contain NO simple curves. The construction is similar to the construction of pseudo-arc.
A: To help clarify a well known characterization: If U is a connected open bounded simply connected planar set, then the boundary of U is a simple closed curve iff the boundary of U is locally path connected and contains no cut points.
Comments:
0) Definition. p is a cut point of the connected space X iff X\p is not connected. 
1) Definition. By `boundary' of an open bounded planar set U, we mean the difference U closure minus U.
2) For necessity, observe that the unit circle X is locally path connected and X\p is connected for all p in X.
3) For sufficiency, every orientation preserving conformal homeomorphism ( Riemann map) f: int(D) --->U extends continuously to the respective closures iff the boundary of U is locally path connected. (Caratheodory). If the extension is not 1-1, a straightforward geometric construction yields a non cutpoint on the boundary of U.
4) Mirko's nice sketch of the `Warsaw circle' shows a non locally path connected boundary can have no cut points, and pac-man with a closed mouth shows a locally path connected boundary can have cut points. Thus two the mentioned conditions are independent.
