I have a problem in understanding the proof of a theorem by Happel-Reiten-Smalø. The original reference is this article http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.4473 .

I write down the text of the theorem and a lemma which is needed in the proof.

Lemma 3.2.4 Let $k$ be a field and $\mathcal A$ a $k$-linear abelian category that is Ext-finite. Let $T\in\mathcal A$ be a tilting object. Then the functor $-\otimes_{\Lambda}T$ induces an isomorphism $$ \text{Ext}_{\Lambda}^n(M,N)\overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow}\text{Ext}_{\mathcal A}^n(M\otimes_{\Lambda}T,N\otimes_{\Lambda}T) $$ for all $M$, $N$ in $\mathcal Y(T)$ and $n\geq 0$. [$\mathcal Y(T) = \{M\in\text{mod }\Lambda\mid \text{Tor}_1^{\Lambda}(M,T) = 0\}$]

Theorem 3.2.5 (Happel-Reiten-Smalø). Let $\mathcal A$ be a $k$-linear abelian category that is Ext-finite. Let $T$ be a tilting object in $\mathcal A$ and $\Lambda=\text{End}_{\mathcal A}(T)$. Then the functor $$ -\otimes_{\Lambda}^{\mathbf{L}} T\colon\mathbf{D}^b(\text{mod } \Lambda) \to \mathbf{D}^b(\mathcal A) $$ is an equivalence of triangulated categories and its right adjoint $\mathbf{R}\text{Hom}_{\mathcal A}(T,-)$ is a quasi-inverse.

Proof. Set $F_T = -\otimes_{\Lambda}^{\mathbf L}T$ [the left derived functor of $\otimes_{\Lambda}$]. We identify objects in $\text{mod }\Lambda$ and $\mathcal A$ with complexes that are concentrated in degree $0$. For instance, $F_T M = M\otimes_{\Lambda} T$ for each $M$ in $\mathcal Y(T)$. We need to show that for each pair of complexes $X$, $Y$ in $\text{mod }\Lambda$, the induced map $$ \phi_{X,Y}\colon\text{Hom}_{\mathbf D^b(\text{mod }\Lambda)}(X,Y)\to\text{Hom}_{\mathbf D^b(\mathcal A)}(F_TX,F_TY) $$ is bijective. Set $$ \ell(X) = \operatorname{card}\{n\in\mathbb Z\mid X_n\neq 0\} $$ and note that each bounded complex $X\neq 0$ fits into an exact triangle $X'\to X\to X''\to X'[1]$ such that $\ell(X') = \ell(X)-1$ and $\ell(X'') = 1$.

Using the five lemma and induction on $\ell(X)+\ell(Y)$, one shows that $\phi_{X,Y}$ is bijective. The case $\ell(X) = \ell(Y) = 1$ follows from lemma 3.2.4. To be precise, one uses that each $\Lambda$-module $M$ fits into an exact sequence $0\to M'\to P\to M \to 0$ with $M'$ and $P$ in $\mathcal Y(T)$, which yields an exact triangle $M'\to P\to M\to M'[1]$. [...]

Next they show that the given functor is dense, but I am stuck on this passage. I can't see how I could merge the given tools (induction, five lemma, every $\Lambda$-module fits into such an exact sequence) in order to get to the assertion.

I think this theorem is not difficult to find in the literature, for example in Happel-Reiten-Smalø, "Tilting in abelian categories and quasitilted algebras", theorem 4.6. Anyway, the proof always requires torsion pairs, and I have no knowledge about them, so I would like to understand a proof which avoids them.

  • $\begingroup$ Let $A \rightarrow B \rightarrow C \rightarrow$ be a triangle. The five lemma tells you that if two out of $\phi_{A[n],Y}$, $\phi_{B[n],Y}$, $\phi_{C[n],Y}$ are bijective for all $n$, then so is the third. Similarly in the other variable. We know that $\phi_{X[n],Y}$ is bijective for all $n$ when $X, Y \in \mathcal Y(T)$. The proof above shows one way to chose triangles to get the result for arbitrary $X,Y$. $\endgroup$ Jun 11, 2015 at 22:44
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It's not what you asked but if you want to learn classical results of torsion pairs, I would recommend you the following reference on torsion pairs which is quite elementary: the book of Assem, Simson and Skowronski, Elements of the Representation Theory of Associative Algebras: Volume 1 Chapter VI.1 and after $\endgroup$ Jun 15, 2015 at 7:48

1 Answer 1


Here are some more details.

Lemma 3.2.4 written in the notation of Theorem 3.2.5 becomes the statement that $$\phi_{M,N[n]}\colon {\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\operatorname{mod} \Lambda)}(M,N[n]) \to {\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\mathcal A)}(F_TM,F_TN[n])$$ is an isomorphism for all $M,N$ in $\mathcal Y(T)$ and $n \geq 0$. It is also an isomorphism when $n<0$ since then both sides are $0$.

For any $N$ in $\operatorname{mod} \Lambda$ there is a triangle $$N'\to P\to N\to N'[1]$$ with $N',P$ in $\mathcal Y(T)$, and for all $n \in \mathbb Z$ we get a commutative diagram $\require{AMScd}$ \begin{CD} \scriptsize {\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b({\rm{mod}}\Lambda)}(M,N'[n]) @>>> \scriptsize{\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\operatorname{mod} \Lambda)}(M,P[n]) @>>> \scriptsize{\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\operatorname{mod} \Lambda)}(M,N[n]) @>>> \scriptsize{\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\operatorname{mod} \Lambda)}(M,N'[n+1]) @>>> \scriptsize{\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\operatorname{mod} \Lambda)}(M,P[n+1])\\ @VV{\wr}V @VV{\wr}V @VVV @VV{\wr}V @VV{\wr}V\\ \scriptsize{\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\mathcal A)}(F_TM,F_TN'[n]) @>>> \scriptsize{\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\mathcal A)}(F_TM,F_TP[n]) @>>> \scriptsize{\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\mathcal A)}(F_TM,F_TN[n]) @>>> \scriptsize {\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\mathcal A)}(F_TM,F_TN'[n+1]) @>>> \scriptsize{\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\mathcal A)}(F_TX,F_TP[n+1]) \end{CD}

Since all the other downward arrows are isomorphisms, it follows from the five lemma that the middle downward arrow is an isomorphism. So $$\phi_{M,N[n]}\colon {\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\operatorname{mod} \Lambda)}(M,N[n]) \to {\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\mathcal A)}(F_TM,F_TN[n])$$ is an isomorphism for all $M$ in $\mathcal Y(T)$, $N$ in $\operatorname{mod} \Lambda$ and $n \in \mathbb Z$. A similar argument in the other variable gives that $\phi_{M,N[n]}$ is an isomorphism for all $M,N$ in $\operatorname{mod} \Lambda$ and $n \in \mathbb Z$.

This is the basis for the induction. The inductive step uses triangles of the form $$Y' \to Y \to Y'' \to Y'[1]$$ with $\ell(Y') = \ell(Y)-1$ and $\ell(Y'') = 1$. We apply the five lemma to the commutative diagram $\require{AMScd}$ \begin{CD} \scriptsize {\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b({\rm{mod}}\Lambda)}(X,Y''[n-1]) @>>> \scriptsize{\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b({\rm{mod}}\Lambda)}(X,Y'[n]) @>>> \scriptsize{\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b({\rm{mod}}\Lambda)}(X,Y[n]) @>>> \scriptsize{\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b({\rm{mod}}\Lambda)}(X,Y''[n]) @>>> \scriptsize{\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b({\rm{mod}}\Lambda)}(X,Y'[n+1])\\ @VV{\wr}V @VV{\wr}V @VVV @VV{\wr}V @VV{\wr}V\\ \scriptsize{\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\mathcal A)}(F_TX,F_TY''[n-1]) @>>> \scriptsize{\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\mathcal A)}(F_TX,F_TY'[n]) @>>> \scriptsize{\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\mathcal A)}(F_TX,F_TY[n]) @>>> \scriptsize {\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\mathcal A)}(F_TX,F_TY''[n]) @>>> \scriptsize{\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\mathcal A)}(F_TX,F_TY'[n+1]) \end{CD}

and a similar version for the other variable to conclude that $$\phi_{X,Y}\colon {\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\operatorname{mod} \Lambda)}(X,Y) \to {\rm{Hom}}_{\mathbf D^b(\mathcal A)}(F_TX,F_TY)$$ is an isomorphism for all $X,Y$ in ${\mathbf D^b(\operatorname{mod} \Lambda)}$.

  • $\begingroup$ How do I get the commutative diagrams to fit on the screen? $\endgroup$ Jul 19, 2015 at 10:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.