Let $R=\oplus_{n\geq 0}R_n$ be a standard Noetherian commuative graded ring over a local ring $(A,m)$ where $R_0=A.$ Put $R_+=\oplus_{n\geq 1}R_n.$ Let $M$ be a finitely generated $\mathbb Z$-graded $R$-module. Then Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity of $M$ is defined here. My question is

What is the definition of Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity when we consider $R=\bigoplus\limits_{(r,s)\geq (0,0)}R_{(r,s)},$ $R_+=\bigoplus\limits_{(r,s)\geq (1,1)}R_{(r,s)}$ and $M=\bigoplus\limits_{(r,s)\in \mathbb Z^2}M_{(r,s)}$ a finitely generated $\mathbb Z^2$-graded $R$-module.

I have seen the algebraic geometric version of the definition of multigraded Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity. But I am interested to know the definition with respect to local cohomology and bound of the regularity .

| cite | improve this question | | | | |
  • $\begingroup$ Isn't it just the maximal a-invariant + 1 over the local cohomology modules? At least that would be my first guess. $\endgroup$ – lemiller May 21 '15 at 20:02
  • $\begingroup$ What is the case in multigraded situation? how do you define a-invariants in this case. $\endgroup$ – Cusp May 22 '15 at 5:54
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, the multigraded a-invariant in this case would be an element of Z^2 (see Def 2.2 of this paper), so maybe the regularity arises as the norm of this vector? I haven't tried to write it down, but it would be a first place to try. $\endgroup$ – lemiller May 24 '15 at 18:59

Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity is defined in the general mutligraded case in this paper of Maclagan and Smith. They give the definition in terms of local cohomology and discuss bounding the regularity so this may be what you are looking for.

| cite | improve this answer | | | | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.