3
$\begingroup$

Let $H\in M$ be a convex hypersurface, where $M$ is a complete Riemannian manifold and $H$ is an embedded (complete as a induced metric space) hyper surface without boundary and with positive definite second fundamental form. Is it true that $H$ bound a convex domain $D$ in $M$? i.e. any two point $x, y \in D$ can be connected by a minimal geodesic lies in $D$ and $\partial D=H$.

I suspect this is not true in general, but can anyone provide a countexample or any references?

$\endgroup$
6
$\begingroup$

Counterexample 1: If $D$ is a ball of radius $\frac13$ on the torus $T=\mathbb R^n/\mathbb Z^n$, you can take two points on the opposite sides of the ball such that the minimal geodesic connecting them does not stay in $D$. The boundary $\partial D$ has a strictly positive definite second fundamental form.

Counterexample 2: Let $M$ be your favorite Riemannian manifold and $H$ a convex hypersurface that bounds a domain $D$. Take two points $x,y\in D$ so that $d(x,y)>d(x,H)+d(y,H)$. By rescaling the metric outside $\bar D$, you can force the minimal geodesic joining $x$ and $y$ to exit $\bar D$.

Counterexample 3: It can happen that the hypersurface $H$ does not bound a domain, meaning that $M\setminus H$ has only one connected component. If there are two components in the complement, you can always build a handle between them.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.