Radii and centers in Banach spaces Suppose I have a Banach space $V$ and a set $A \subseteq V$ such that for all $\epsilon > 0$ there exists $v$ such that $A \subseteq \overline{B}(v, r + \epsilon)$. Does there exist $c$ such that $A \subseteq \overline{B}(c, r)$?
The answer is clearly yes for finite dimensional normed spaces: Define $T_\epsilon = \bigcap_{a \in A} \overline{B}(a, r + \epsilon)$. The $T_\epsilon$ form a chain of closed sets and for $\epsilon > 0$ are non-empty, so have the finite intersection property. Thus when $V$ is finite dimensional they have non-empty intersection, and any element of the intersection works as $c$.
For more general Banach spaces I feel like you should be able to choose a cauchy sequence $x_n$ such that $x_n \in T_{\epsilon_n}$ with $\epsilon_n \to 0$, but I can't seem to make it work.
Note that an arbitrary choice of $x_n \in T_{\epsilon_n}$ can't be guaranteed to be Cauchy: If $V$ is $l^\infty$ and $A = \{ x : x_0 = 0, ||x|| \leq 1 \}$ then diam$(T_\epsilon) \geq 2$ because you can choose $c_0$ arbitrarily in $[-1, 1]$
Note also that the assumption of $V$ a Banach space is essential: If $V$ is not Banach and $c$ is an element of the completion which is not in $V$ then $A = \overline{B}(c, 1) \cap V$ has no center. 
 A: I believe that the property does not hold for all Banach spaces, but my counterexample is a little involved.  If you've the patience then follow me through...
Let $V=\bigoplus_{n=1}^\infty \ell^n_2$ where $\ell^p_2$ is $\mathbb{R}^2$ with
norm $\lVert\cdot\rVert_p$ (Note: $n$ is taking the role of $p$).  For $i\geq1$
and $j\in\{0,1\}$ we have $e_{i,j}$, the $j^{th}$ standard basis vector of
$\ell^i_2$ in $V$.
Give $V$ the norm $\lVert v\rVert=\sup_n\lVert v_n\rVert_n$.
Let $W=\{v\in V:\lVert v_n\rVert_n\to 0\}$.  I assert that $W$ is a Banach space.
Certainly every $e_{i,j}\in W$.
Let $A=\{e_{k,0}+e_{k,1}, e_{k,0}-e_{k,1}:k\geq 1\}$.
Fact: Let $r(A)$ be the infimum of radii of balls containing $A$.  Then $r(A)\leq1$
Proof:
Let $c_N=\sum_{i=1}^n e_{i,0}$.  We wish to compute the distance of each point
of $A$ from $c_N$.
For $k\leq N$ we have
$\lVert c_N-e_{k,0}-e_{k,1}\rVert$
$=\lVert\sum_{i=1\ (i\not=k)}^Ne_{i,0}-e_{k,1}\rVert$
$=\sup\{\lVert e_{i,0}\rVert_i:i\leq N,i\not=k\}\cup\{\lVert-e_{k,1}\rVert_k\}$
$=1$
and similarly for $\lVert c_N-e_{k,0}+e_{k,1}\rVert$.
For $k>N$ we have
$\lVert c_N-e_{k,0}-e_{k,1}\rVert$
$=\max(\lVert c_N\rVert,\lVert e_{k,0}+e_{k,1}\rVert_k)$
$= \max(1,(1+1)^\frac{1}{k})$
$= 2^\frac{1}{k}$
$\leq 2^\frac{1}{N}$
and similarly for $\lVert c_N-e_{k,0}+e_{k,1}\rVert$.
Thus $A\subseteq \overline{B}(c_N,2^\frac{1}{N})$ and so $r(A)\leq2^\frac{1}{N}$.  Letting
$N\to\infty$ we have $r(A)\leq 1$.
QED
Fact: $A$ is not contained in a ball of radius $1$.
Proof:
Suppose $A\subseteq \overline{B}(c,1)$.  Then in particular for every $n$ we have
$\lVert c-e_{n,0}-e_{n,1}\rVert\leq 1$ and thus $\lVert c_n-e_{n,0}-e_{n,1}\rVert_n\leq 1$.  Similarly $\lVert c_n-e_{n,0}+e_{n,1}\rVert_n\leq 1$.
Simple consideration of $\ell^n_2$ shows that this implies $c_n=e_{n,0}$.
Thus $\lVert c_n\rVert=1\not\to0$ and $c\not\in W$, contradicting the assumption.
QED
A: I think that http://www.ams.org/journals/tran/1982-271-02/S0002-9947-1982-0654848-2/S0002-9947-1982-0654848-2.pdf [together with its references] provides us with several counterexamples [as well as with some remarkable examples], in the infinite-dimensional framework.
A: The answer may be affirmative when $V$ is a reflexive Banach space.
Each $T_\epsilon$ is a closed bounded convex set. If the intersection
of the $T_\epsilon$ is nonempty then each element of this intersection
is an admissible centre. I found a paper online
Sharma, B. K., Dewangan, C. L.
Fixed point theorem in convex metric space,
Zb. Rad. Prirod.-Mat. Fak. Ser. Mat. 25 (1995), no. 1, 9-18
http://www.emis.de/journals/NSJOM/framepaper.htm
which asserts that every weakly compact convex subset of a Banach
space has the property that a chain of nonempty closed convex
subsets has nonempty intersection. Alas, they don't give
a proof or reference for this.
By a theorem of W. F. Eberlein,
Weak Compactness in Banach Spaces,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA  33 (1947), 51–53
the closed unit ball in a Banach space is weakly compact iff the
Banach space is reflexive.
