6
$\begingroup$

I am almost certain that I read somewhere that the following is true, but I cannot seem to locate the reference. I would be most appreciative if someone could point me to a reference. The result was in one of the following forms.

Premise: Let $X$ be a Polish space. Let $S$ be the vector space of totally finite signed Borel measures on $X$. Let $T_N$ be the topology induced by the total variation norm on $S$. Let $T_{WC}$ be the topology of weak convergence of measures on $S$ (sometimes called the weak* topology).

Conclusion: Then the Borel $\sigma$-algebras generated by $T_N$ and $T_{WC}$ are the same.

Other form (which would imply the above):

Premise: Let $X$ be a measurable space with a countably generated $\sigma$-algebra. Let $S$ be the vector space of totally finite signed measures on $X$. Let $T_N$ be the topology induced by the total variation norm on $S$. Let $A$ be the $\sigma$-algebra on $S$ generated by maps of the form $\mu \mapsto \int_X f d\mu$ where $f\colon X \to \mathbb{R}$ varies over bounded measurable real-valued functions on $X$.

Conclusion: Then $A$ is equal to the Borel $\sigma$-algebras generated by $T_N$.

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

No, it isn't true.

Let $E$ be a non-Borel set in $X$ and consider the set of Dirac measures $E' = \{ \delta_x : x \in E\} \subset S$. Note that for each Dirac measure $\mu$, the total-variation ball of radius 1/2 about $\mu$ contains no other Dirac measure. Hence $E'$ is closed in $T_N$, hence Borel in $T_N$.

On the other hand, it is well known that the map $F : X \to (S, T_{WC})$ defined by $x \mapsto \delta_x$ is continuous (in fact, a homeomorphism onto its image). In particular, it is Borel measurable. Since $E = F^{-1}(E')$ is not Borel in $X$, we conclude that $E'$ is not Borel in $T_{WC}$.

A statement that is true is that the total-variation norm is a Borel function on $(S, T_{WC})$; indeed, it is lower semi-continuous. This is an immediate consequence of the identity $$\|\mu\| = \sup \left\{ \int \varphi \,d\mu : \varphi \in C_b(X), \|\varphi\|_\infty \le 1\right\}$$ which follows from the fact that each finite $\mu$ on a Polish space is regular. So every total-variation ball is $\sigma(T_{WC})$ measurable. But since $T_N$ is not second countable, we can't conclude that the open balls generate $\sigma(T_N)$, and indeed they do not.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What if one restricts to a class of absolutely continuous probability measures (or a class of probability measures which have at most finitely many atoms at fixed points, say $x_1, \ldots, x_k$? In that case do the two $\sigma$-algebras coincide? $\endgroup$ – Jack London Apr 21 at 16:40
  • $\begingroup$ @JackLondon: If all your measures are supported on a fixed finite set, then your space of measures is finite dimensional and the two topologies are the same, hence their Borel $\sigma$-algebras are also the same. $\endgroup$ – Nate Eldredge Apr 21 at 16:45
  • $\begingroup$ @JackLondon: If all your measures are absolutely continuous to some fixed measure $\mu_0$, then I think it is again true, because now $(S, T_N)$ is isometric to $L^1(\mu_0)$, which is separable and second countable. The argument above shows that every ball is $\sigma(T_{WC})$ measurable, and now $\sigma(T_N)$ is generated by balls. $\endgroup$ – Nate Eldredge Apr 21 at 16:48
  • $\begingroup$ I've not been sufficiently clear: the space on which measures are defined, say $X$, could be infinite. Fix a finite subset $\{x_1, \ldots, x_m\}\subset X$; then I'm considering the class of all the probability measures of the form $\mu=\alpha_0 \mu_{AC} + \sum_{i=1}^m \alpha_i\delta_{x_i}$ where $\mu_{AC}$ is a probability measure on $X$ absolutely continuous w.r.t. a fixed measure $\nu$ (e.g. Lebesgue if $X \subset \mathbb{R}^d$) and $\alpha_0+\alpha_1+\ldots+\alpha_m=1$. $\endgroup$ – Jack London Apr 21 at 16:51
  • $\begingroup$ For such a class, could the two $\sigma$-algebra coincide? $\endgroup$ – Jack London Apr 21 at 16:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.