4
$\begingroup$

Inspired by the recent question on singularities of the moduli stack of Calabi-Yau threefolds (Singularities of the moduli stack of Calabi-Yau threefolds) I'd like to ask the following question.

Is the moduli stack of $n$-dimensional hyperkahler varieties (resp. polarized hyperkahler varieties with fixed Hilbert polynomial) smooth?

In other words, are hyperkahler varieties (resp. polarized hyperkahler varieties) unobstructed?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hyperkähler varieties are Calabi-Yau, hence unobstructed. $\endgroup$
    – abx
    Commented Apr 27, 2015 at 18:31
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @abx that's right, but $H^2(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$ is nonzero for $X$ hyperkaehler, and we want to study deformations of a pair $(X, L)$. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 27, 2015 at 18:41

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

I think the answer should be yes. Here is a sketch. First, by the Bogomolov-Tian-Todorov theorem (as in the answer to the question about CY), the formal deformation space of a hyperkaehler $X$ is smooth. If we want to deform the polarization $L$, we have a nontrivial obstruction space $H^2(X, \mathcal{O}_X)\cong k$. Since $H^1(X, \mathcal{O}_X)=0$ (so that $Def(X,L)\to Def(X)$ is a closed immersion), geometrically, the formal deformation space $Def(X, L)$ is a hypersurface in the formal deformation space $Def(X)$ (see the argument in Deligne, P. "Relèvement des surfaces K3 en caractéristique nulle"). To show that this hypersurface is smooth, we need to check that the "second order obstruction" product $H^1(X, T_X)\times H^1(X, T_X)\to H^2(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$ is non-degenerate (see the argument in Ogus "Supersingular K3 crystals"). Using the hyperkaehler structure $\omega$, this should be equivalent to $H^1(X, \Omega_X)\times H^1(X, T_X)\to H^2(X, \mathcal{O}_X)\cong k$ (cup product and trace) being non-degenerate.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .