11
$\begingroup$

By work of Deligne and others (I am following Deligne-Milne's notes which I just began to read: http://www.jmilne.org/math/xnotes/tc.pdf) we know that a given affine group scheme G can be recovered from their category of representations Rep(G) (thought of as a neutral Tannakian category). If G-->G' is a morphism Prop. 2.21 characterizes when is it faithfully flat (resp. closed immersion) in terms of properties of the induced map Rep(G')-->Rep(G).

My question is the following: is it possible to characterize that the sequence K-->G-->G' is exact in terms of the induced maps Rep(G')-->Rep(G)-->Rep(K).

( Actually I am interested in a situation when Rep(G')-->Rep(G) is known and one wonders if one can "construct" Rep(K) ).

$\endgroup$

3 Answers 3

9
$\begingroup$

About your main question I suggest looking at Appendix A in

On Nori's Fundamental Group Scheme Hélène Esnault, Phùng Hô Hai, Xiaotao Sun

Geometry and dynamics of groups and spaces, 377–398, Progr. Math., 265, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2008.

http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0605645

http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-7643-8608-5_8

I quote :

"Let $L\xrightarrow q G\xrightarrow p A$ be a sequence of homomorphism of affine group scheme over a field $k$. It induces a sequence of functors ${Rep(A)\xrightarrow{p^*}Rep(G)\xrightarrow{q^*}Rep(L)}$ where $Rep$ denotes the category of finite dimensional representations over $k$.

Theorem

With the above settings we have

(i) the map $p:G\to A$ is faithfully flat (and in particular surjective) if and only if $p^*$ is a full subcategory of $Rep(G)$, closed under taking subquotients.

(ii) the map $q:L\to G$ is a closed immersion if and only if any object of $Rep(L)$ is a subquotient of object of the form $q^*(V)$ for some $ V\in Rep(G)$.

(iii) Assume that $q$ is a closed immersion and that $p$ is faithfully flat. Then the sequence $L\xrightarrow q G\xrightarrow p A$ is exact if and only if the following conditions are fulfilled:

(a) For an object $V\in Rep(G)$, $q^*(V)$ in $Rep(L)$ is trivial if and only if $V\cong p^*U$ for some $U\in Rep(A)$.

(b) Let $W_0$ be the maximal trivial subobject of $q^*(V)$ in $Rep(L)$. Then there exists $V_0\subset V$ in $Rep(G)$, such that $q^*(V_0)\cong W_0$.

(c) Any $W$ in $Rep(L)$ is embeddable (hence by taking duals a quotient) of $q^*(V)$ for some $V\in Rep(G)$.

The statements (i) and (ii) are due to Deligne-Milne. "

About your original interest you could have a look at :

Milne, J. S. Quotients of Tannakian categories. Theory Appl. Categ. 18 (2007), No. 21, 654–664.

http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0508479

From the introduction :

"Given a tannakian category $\mathsf{T}$ and a tannakian subcategory $\mathsf{S}$, we ask whether there exists a quotient of $\mathsf{T}$ by $\mathsf{S}$, by which we mean an exact tensor functor $q\colon\mathsf{T}% \rightarrow\mathsf{Q}$ from $\mathsf{T}$ to a tannakian category $\mathsf{Q}$ such that

  1. the objects of $\mathsf{T}$ that become trivial in $\mathsf{Q}$ (i.e., isomorphic to a direct sum of copies of $1$ in $\mathsf{Q}$) are precisely those in $\mathsf{S}$, and

  2. every object of $\mathsf{Q}$ is a subquotient of an object in the image of $q$.

When $\mathsf{T}$ is the category $Rep(G)$ of finite-dimensional representations of an affine group scheme $G$ the answer is obvious: there exists a unique normal subgroup $H$ of $G$ such that the objects of $\mathsf{S}$ are the representations on which $H$ acts trivially, and there exists a canonical functor $q$ satisfying (a) and (b), namely, the restriction functor $Rep(G)\rightarrow Rep(H)$ corresponding to the inclusion $H\hookrightarrow G$. By contrast, in the general case, there need not exist a quotient, and when there does there will usually not be a canonical one. In fact, we prove that there exists a $q$ satisfying (a) and (b) if and only if $\mathsf{S}$ is neutral, in which case the $q$ are classified by the $k$-valued fibre functors on $\mathsf{S}$. Here $k=End(1)$ is assumed to be a field."

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

You can think about category $Rep(K)$ as about $G-$equivariant sheaves on $G'$. This translates into the following: let $A$ be the algebra of functions on $G'$; this is commutative algebra in the category $Rep(G')$. Using fully faithful functor $Rep(G')\to Rep(G)$ we can consider $A$ as a commutative algebra in category $Rep(G)$. Now $Rep(K)$ is equivalent to $A-$modules in the category $Rep(G)$ as a tensor category. Equivalently, $Rep(K)$ is de-equivariantization of $Rep(G)$ with respect to $Rep(G')$.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Given two elements $V,W$ of $Rep_G$, we can compute $Hom_{K} (V, W)$. It is just the maximal subobject of $V^{\vee} \otimes W$ that comes by pullback from a representation of $G'$. (Because it is the maximal $K$-invariant subrepresentation of that)

I think $Rep_{K}$ is essentially the universal abelian category containing those objects and those morphisms. If $K$ is reductive, I can make this expicit - you start with the representations of $G$, give them their new endomorphism algebras, and then split all the idempotents to get the representations of $K$. So that is an explicit description.

But I don't know exactly what to do about unipotents.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .