Two dimensional brownian motion will intersect its own path infinitly many times. What is the average value of area, closed by curve during an intersection in brownian motion?
-
1$\begingroup$ In what sense do you mean area? If you count the area with multiplicities, the expectation does not exist. See mathoverflow.net/questions/130532/…. Do you count areas where the winding number is 0, but there is no path to infinity disjoint from the Brownian path? $\endgroup$– Douglas ZareCommented Apr 9, 2015 at 16:09
-
$\begingroup$ What is the meaning of "Area With Multiplicity" in your comment? $\endgroup$– Mohammad GhiasiCommented Apr 9, 2015 at 16:20
-
$\begingroup$ The topological multiplicity is the winding number of the curve around the point. If you take something like $(cost(t),sin(t))$ for $t\in[0,4\pi]$, this winds around the origin twice. If you take a figure-8 knot, $4_1$, or the knots $6_1$ or $7_2$, with their standard minimum crossing diagrams, there is a bounded region about which the knot has $0$ winding number. Would you want to count that area as $0$ or $1$? $\endgroup$– Douglas ZareCommented Apr 9, 2015 at 17:03
2 Answers
One way to define the "enclosed area" for a curve $\mathbf{r}(t)$ in the $x$-$y$ plane of duration $T$, with $\mathbf{r}(0)=\mathbf{r}(T)$, is via the socalled algebraic area $A=\tfrac{1}{2}\int_0^T (\mathbf{r}\times\dot{\mathbf{r}})\cdot\hat{z}\,dt$. (The dot indicates the time derivative and $\hat{z}$ is a unit vector perpendicular to the plane.) A loop traversed in counterclockwise direction contributes a positive amount to $A$, clockwise propagation contributes a negative amount. The probability distribution of $A$ for Brownian motion is known [1,2,3,4],
$$P(A)=\frac{\pi}{4DT}\cosh^{-2}\left(\frac{\pi A}{2DT}\right).$$
The two-dimensional diffusion constant is defined by the mean square displacement,
$$E(|\mathbf{r}(T)-\mathbf{r}(0)|^2)=4DT.$$
The average of $A$ itself is zero (because positive and negative contributions cancel), the average of $|A|$ is
$$E(|A|)= \frac{2DT\log 2}{\pi}.$$
[1] P. Lévy, Le mouvement Brownien plan (1940), and later references here.
[2] D.C. Khandekar and F.W. Wiegel, Distribution of the area enclosed by a plane random walk (1988).
[3] B. Duplantier, Areas of planar Brownian curves (1989).
[4] A. Comtet, J. Desbois, and S. Ouvry, Winding of planar Brownian curves (1990).
-
5$\begingroup$ This is a bit subtle for Brownian motion because the time derivative doesn't exist. Basically, the nowhere-differentiability of Brownian motion prevents you from sensibly determining whether a loop is being traversed clockwise or counterclockwise, since you don't know which direction it's going at any given moment. The usual solution is to replace the Riemann integral with a stochastic integral, giving you what's known as the Levy area process. I don't have access to the paper you link right now, so I'm not certain if their model is equivalent. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 9, 2015 at 21:29
-
$\begingroup$ thanks for the caveat, I added pertinent references to Lévy and later work. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 10, 2015 at 6:29
There is a beautiful connection between the area swept out by Brownian motion and the Dirichlet function:
$L(s)=\sum_{n=0}^{+\infty} \frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)^s}$.
Proposition: Let $A_t$ be the area swept out by the Brownian motion up to time $t$. Then for every $\alpha \ge 0$ $$\mathbb{E}(|A_t|^\alpha)=\frac{4 \Gamma(1+\alpha)}{\pi^{1+\alpha}} L(1+\alpha)t^\alpha$$
Proof: Let $B_t=(B^1_t,B^2_t)$ be a two-dimensional Brownian motion. The algebraic area enclosed by $B$ up to time $t$ is given by
$A_t=\frac{1}{2} \int_0^t B_s^1 dB_s^2-B_s^2dB_s^1$
where the integral is understood as a Ito integral. It is an easy exercise to check that
$A_t=\frac{1}{2} \beta_{\int_0^t \rho_s^2 ds}$
where $\rho_t=\| B_t \|$ and $\beta$ is a Brownian motion independent from $\rho$.
Thus we have,
$\mathbb{E}(| A_t |^\alpha)=\frac{1}{2^\alpha} \mathbb{E}\left(\left| \beta_{\int_0^t \rho_s^2 ds} \right|^\alpha \right)$
Using the Brownian scaling property and the independence, we obtain
$\mathbb{E}(| A_t |^\alpha)=\frac{1}{2^\alpha} \mathbb{E}\left(| \beta_{1} |^\alpha\right) \mathbb{E}\left(\left( \int_0^t \rho_s^2 ds\right)^{\alpha/2}\right)=\frac{t^\alpha}{2^\alpha} \mathbb{E}\left(| \beta_{1} |^\alpha\right) \mathbb{E}\left(\left( \int_0^1 \rho_s^2 ds\right)^{\alpha/2}\right)$
Now, it is well-known that for every $\lambda \ge 0$
$\mathbb{E}\left(e^{-\frac{\lambda^2}{2} \int_0^1 \rho_s^2 ds}\right)=\frac{1}{\cosh \lambda} .$
We can deduce from this Laplace transform the following Mellin transform formula
$\mathbb{E}\left(\left( \int_0^1 \rho_u^2 du\right)^{s}\right)=\Gamma(1+s)2^{1+s} \left(\frac{2}{\pi} \right)^{2s+1}L(1+2s)$
The result follows then easily.
-
$\begingroup$ hmm, I'm a bit confused: the average of $|A|$ would give $L(2)$ which is the Catalan number, which seems to disagree with the answer I found in the literature. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 14, 2015 at 21:49
-
$\begingroup$ The formula you give is for the Brownian loop, not for the Brownian motion. The Brownian loop is the Brownian motion conditioned to go back at 0 at time T. Unfortunately, the Fourier transform of the area swept out by the Brownian motion can not be inverted simply and the distribution of A is not known. I found the above formula for the Brownian motion quite cute and it was too long for a comment, so I put it as an answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 15, 2015 at 0:51
-
$\begingroup$ thanks for the clarification; if the path is not closed, wouldn't the definition of "enclosed area" depend on the choice of origin? (I'm thinking of a straight line, what area does it "enclose"?) $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 15, 2015 at 0:55
-
1$\begingroup$ @Captain Darling, since $|A_t|$ is non negative, $\mathbb{E}(|A_t|)=0$ would imply $A_t=0$ almost surely, which is not possible. $\endgroup$ Commented May 17, 2015 at 16:13
-
1$\begingroup$ This gives a new proof that there are infinitely may primes which are $1\mod{4}$ and also $3\mod{4}$ because there are easy arguments in number theory that show that $L(1)\neq 0$ is automatically equivalent to the existence of infinitely many primes. Could you prove a similar identity involving the function $L(s)=\sum_{n=0}^{=\infty}\left(\frac{1}{(3n+1)^s}+\frac{-1}{(3n+1)^s}\right)$? This would show that there are infinitely many primes $p\equiv 1 \mod{3}$. $\endgroup$– Dr. PiCommented May 17, 2015 at 17:48