I am sorry if this is too elementary; I had posted it on math.stack but no one answered.

Let $P\to M$ a principal fibre bundle with fibre $G$, and let $A\in \Omega^{1}(P)\otimes\mathfrak{g}$ be a connection on $P$, where $\mathfrak{g}$ is the Lie algebra of $G$. Associated to every connection there is a curvature $F\in\Omega^{2}(P)\otimes\mathfrak{g}$ defined as

$F = DA$

where $D\colon \Omega^{r}(P)\otimes\mathfrak{g}\to \Omega^{r+1}(P)\otimes\mathfrak{g}$ defined as $D\Omega(X_{1},\dots, X_{r+1}) = d\Omega(X^{H}_{1},\dots, X^{H}_{r+1})$. The superscript $H$ denotes the projection to the horizontal distribution given by the connection and $d\colon \colon \Omega^{r}(P)\to \Omega^{r+1}(P)$. Now, $F$ induces (using local sections), a two form

$\mathcal{F}\in\Omega^{2}(M;\mathrm{ad} P)$

taking values in the adjoint bundle of $P$, which is a vector bundle of rank $dim\, \mathfrak{g}$. The two-form $\mathcal{F}$ satisfies

$\mathcal{D}\mathcal{F} = d\mathcal{F} + [\mathcal{A},\mathcal{F}] = 0$

where $\mathcal{A}$ is the local form of the connection one-form $A$. The two-form $\mathcal{F}$ is a particular case of a form taking values in a vector bundle with a connection. For this kind of forms there is a natural derivative $d_{\nabla}$, the exterior covariant derivative. In the case of $\mathcal{F}$ the vector bundle is $\mathrm{ad}\, P$ and the connection $\nabla$ is the induced on the adjoint bundle by $A$. My question is, what is the relation between $\mathcal{D}$ and $d_{\nabla}$? Are they the same?


  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think you will have your answer once you unravel what you mean, in your formula for $D\mathcal{F}$, by "$\mathrm{d}$" when it is supposed to be operating on elements of $\Omega^r(M;\mathrm{ad}P)$ (and, of course, what you actually mean by $\mathcal{A}$ as "the local form of the connection 1-form $A$"). $\endgroup$ Mar 30, 2015 at 8:36
  • $\begingroup$ @RobertBryant: I think they are the same. Loosely speaking: Let $\left\{ e_{i}\right\}$ be a local frame for $ad\, P$. Then $\mathcal{F} = \mathcal{F}^{i}\otimes e_{i}$ and $d_{\nabla}\mathcal{F} = d\mathcal{F}^{i}\otimes e_{i} + \mathcal{F}^{i}\wedge \nabla e_{i} = d\mathcal{F}^{i}\otimes e_{i} + \mathcal{F}^{i}\wedge \omega_{i}^{j} e_{j} = d\mathcal{F} + [\mathcal{A},\mathcal{F}] =\mathcal{D}\mathcal{F} $ where in the last step I have used that the vector bundle is the adjoint bundle of a principal bundle with connection. $\endgroup$
    – Bilateral
    Mar 30, 2015 at 10:51
  • $\begingroup$ What does 'they' refer to in your comment? I was asking you to clarify what you meant by applying $\mathrm{d}$ directly to $\mathcal{F}$ and what you meant by the term $\mathcal{A}$. I claim that neither of these two terms, each taken alone, is a well-defined operator, and, when you do take a local trivialization to define a $\mathcal{D}$ that is independent of local trivialization (as you have done), then you immediately see that $\mathcal{D}$ has the same formula as $\mathrm{d}_\nabla$, so there was no way that they could have failed to be equal, as long as they were both Leibnitz operators. $\endgroup$ Mar 30, 2015 at 11:30
  • $\begingroup$ @RobertBryant: When you wrote "I think you will have your answer once you unravel what you mean.." I thought you meant that I had to think about it my self and then I would arrive to the answer :). By "they" I meant $\mathcal{D}$ and $d_{\nabla}$. By $\mathcal{A}$ I mean the local pullback to the base of $A$ by means of a local section. I agree with you: the $d$ in $\mathcal{DF} = d\mathcal{F} + [\mathcal{A},\mathcal{F}]$ is not really well defined, only when you know that it is $d_{\nabla}\mathcal{F}$ it makes sense. However that formula is written like that in many references... $\endgroup$
    – Bilateral
    Mar 30, 2015 at 11:46

1 Answer 1


First, there is a canonical isomorphism $\Phi$ between $\Omega^k(M; Ad P)$ and $\Omega^k_{Ad, h}(P; \mathfrak{g})$, where the subscripts signify that the form is horizontal and of type $Ad$ (i.e. equivariant). This isomorphism is canonical and does not need a local trivialization. To illustrate the idea, consider the case $k=0$. A section $\varphi$ of the adjoint bundle defines a function $\Phi(\varphi)$ on $P$ with values in $\mathfrak{g}$ by $\varphi(m) = [p, \Phi(\varphi) (p)]$ where $\pi(p) = m$. In your notation, $\Phi^{-1}(F) = \mathcal{F}$.

Next, the exterior differential in the adjoint bundle (indeed in every associated bundle) is defined by making the following diagram commutative: $$\begin{matrix} \Omega^k_{Ad, h}(P; \mathfrak{g}) & \overset{D}{\to} & \Omega^{k+1}_{Ad, h}(P; \mathfrak{g}) \\ \downarrow & & \downarrow \\ \Omega^k(M; Ad P) & \overset{d_{\nabla}}{\to} & \Omega^{k+1}(M; Ad P) \end{matrix}$$ (the vertical arrows being the isomorphism $\Phi$)

Thus $D F = 0$ coincides with $d_{\nabla}\mathcal{F} = 0$ under the isomorphism $\Phi$.

Finally, there is also the viewpoint via local trivializations. Locally, we can identify the connection form with a Lie algebra valued 1-form $\tilde{A}$ on $M$ and the curvature is a 2-form $\tilde{F}$ on $M$ with values in the Lie algebra. It is an easy calculation to see that $D$ locally takes the form $\widetilde{D F} = d \tilde{F} + [\tilde{A}, \tilde{F}]$, i.e. the local representant of $DF$ is given by the right-hand side. Note that this expression only makes sense locally, since the differential of $\mathcal{F}$ as a vector-valued 2-form is not well-defined (without a connection). Nonetheless, $d_\nabla$ is always defined and can be applied to $\mathcal{F}$ without any problems.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, great explanation. A good reference where it is explained in the same style as you did? $\endgroup$
    – Bilateral
    Mar 30, 2015 at 22:55
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You can try Kobayashi, Nomizu "Foundations of Differential Geometry". Their approach is essentially the same through their notation is different. $\endgroup$ Mar 31, 2015 at 8:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.