Let $\boldsymbol{S}$ be $k \times k$ positive semi-definite real symmetric matrix with eigen decomposition $\boldsymbol{S} = \boldsymbol{X} \boldsymbol{\Lambda} \boldsymbol{X}'$ ($\boldsymbol{\Lambda}$ diagonal, $\boldsymbol{X}$ orthonormal matrix of eigenvectors). Assume that we reduce each eigenvalue $\lambda_i$ by $\psi_i \in [0, \lambda_i]$, for $i = 1, \ldots, k$ with $\lambda_i$ sorted so that $\lambda_i \ge \lambda_{i+1}$.

Define our ratio of interest $r_{ij}^\psi$ in terms of elements of the new matrix $\boldsymbol{S}^{\psi}$:

$$ r_{ij}^\psi = \frac{s_{ij}^\psi}{\sqrt{s_{ii}^\psi}\sqrt{s_{jj}^\psi}} = \frac{\sum_{l=1}^k x_{il} x_{jl} (\lambda_l - \psi_l)}{\sqrt{\sum_{l=1}^k x_{il}^2 (\lambda_l - \psi_l)} \sqrt{\sum_{l=1}^k x_{jl}^2 (\lambda_l - \psi_l)}}. $$

How does $r_{ij}^\psi$ change as $\psi_i$ grows? In particular, I am interested in the case when $\psi_i \ge \psi_{i+1}$ for $i = 1, \ldots, k$.

Initially my numerical experiments delivered an increase in absolute value, but now I have found the cases that yield a decrease instead. I can formulate a counterexample for some subset of parameter values using the fact that columns of $\boldsymbol{X}$ are length one and orthogonal to each other (e.g., when $\lambda_k \approx 0$), so strictly speaking I'm done; but I wonder if it can be shown more generally and elegantly.

(If $r_{ij}^\psi$ is thought as a correlation coefficient, then this problem has direct relation to statistics.)

[Updated after Armadillo Jim's response.]


1 Answer 1


I don't think you can say whether the ratios $r_{ij}$ increase or decrease. Consider the following two extremes when $S$ is positive definite with smallest eigenvalue $\lambda_{min}>0$.

(1) Pick every $\psi$ the same positive number, and smaller than $\lambda_{min}$. Then $S^\psi=S-\lambda_{min}I$ since $\lambda_{min}I$ commutes with $X$. Only the diagonal elements of $S$ will change, the diagonals will decrease, and the ratios $r_{ij}$ will all increase.

(2) Pick the $\psi$s so that every adjusted eigenvalue is constant (and equal to $\lambda_{min}$). That is, $\psi_i=\lambda_i-\lambda_{min}$. Then $S^\psi$ is diagonal: it is $\lambda_{min}I$. All the off-diagonals are zero, and the diagonals non-zero so $r_{ij}=0$. That is all the ratios will decrease.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! Since posting this, I had gotten an argument that this is possible, but your way is more elegant than what I had. Also, while I'm convinced (through counterexamples) that a decrease in absolute values is possible, now I'm trying to figure out if this can be proven slightly more generally. I have updated the question. I will wait if a more general answer comes up, otherwise I will accept yours. $\endgroup$
    – Preston
    Mar 24, 2015 at 20:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.