Suppose $D\subset \mathbb C$ is a smoothly bounded domain and it contains the origin. Let $ds$ denote the arc length measure on $\partial D.$ I am interested in the following two inverse problems (perhaps related to certain moment problem):

A) Suppose for some polynomial $p$ there exists $n_0\in\mathbb N$ so that the following identity holds $$\int_{\partial D}\frac{p(z)}{z^n}ds_z=0$$ for all positive integer $n\geq n_0.$ Does it imply that $\partial D$ must be a disk?

A') With the same assumption as in (A) we have $$\int_{\partial D}\frac{p(z)}{(z-t)^n}ds_z=0 \,\,\,\,\text{for all}\,\,\, t\in\ D$$
holding for all $n\geq n_0$. Does this force $\partial D$ to be a disk?

In here $ds$ denotes the arc length measure.

  • As it stands the answer to (A) is clearly no, simply take $p=0$, and $D$ can be anything. – Fan Zheng Mar 21 '15 at 0:53
  • Lets rule that out. $p=0$ is not really interesting. – BigM Mar 21 '15 at 3:54

(A') is equivalent to (A).
Note that (for any given $p$ and $n$) $$F_n(t) = \int_{\partial D} \dfrac{p(z)}{(z-t)^n} ds_z$$ is an analytic function of $t \in D$, and its Maclaurin series is $$ F_n(t) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty {{k+n-1}\choose k} F_{n+k}(0) t^k $$ Thus if $F_n(0) = 0$ for all $n \ge n_0$, we also have $F_n(t) = 0$ for all $n \ge n_0$ and all $t \in D$.

EDIT: It's convenient to invert the domain: let $C = \{0\} \cup \{1/z: z \notin \overline{D}\}$, another smoothly bounded domain. There is a positive measure $d\mu$ on $\partial C$ (not, in general, arc length, but absolutely continuous with respect to it) corresponding to $ds$ on $\partial D$, and $\int_{\partial C} p(1/w) w^n\; d\mu(w) = 0$ for $n \ge n_0$. Now harmonic measure $d\omega_q(w)$ on $\partial C$ for the pole $q \in C$ would have this property for all $n > \deg(p)$ if either $q = 0$ or $p(1/q) = 0$. Is every positive measure on $\partial C$, absolutely continuous wrt arc length, that annihilates $p(1/w) w^n$ for sufficiently large $n$ a linear combination of these? Is it possible to find $D$ (other than a disk) such that $d\mu$ is a linear combination of harmonic measures?

[EDIT]: as pointed out in the comments below, I misunderstood the question (missing the "arc length measure" bit) so that the answer is silly.

Maybe I'm misinterpreting the question, please let me know if this is the case; but I think that the answer is "No". Indeed, by usual analysis in one complex variable, for every $C^1$ curve $\gamma$ that parametrizes your boundary $\partial D$ and every holomorphic function $f$ on $C^*$ you have $$ \int_\gamma f = 2\pi i \text{Res}(f,0). $$ If you take $f(z) = \frac{p(z)}{z^n}$ where $p(z) = \sum a_j z^j$ is your polynomial, then $\text{Res}(f,0) = a_{n-1}$ regardless of the form of your boundary. So I would say that for every boundary and every $p(z)$ you always get 0 provided $n_0 \geq \text{deg}(p)+2$.

The answer for the second one is the same, simply by a change of variables.

(and since you are only interested in very regular functions, namely meromorphic functions, if I remember correctly the $C^1$ condition on the boundary may be dropped, too)

  • 2
    In the question $ds$ is the arc length measure. – BigM Mar 23 '15 at 13:41
  • I'm sorry, I didn't note that in the first version of the question, thanks for the added note. Would you mind pointing to a definition of the arc length measure? Because the only reference I found by googling is page 199 in "The Theory of Subnormal Operators" by John B. Conway (on google books) where it says that the arc-length measure on a (geometric) curve is defined precisely by taking any function $u$ and any parametrization $\gamma$ and imposing $\int_{\partial D}u d\mu = \int_0^1u(\gamma(y))|\gamma'(t)|dt$. This would give the usual notion, thus 0 as in my answer... – Marco Spinaci Mar 23 '15 at 14:56
  • 2
    @MarcoSpinaci: This definition of arc length measure is correct. It differs from $\int f\, dz = \int f\gamma'\, dt$ (no absolute value here). For the circle, the difference (essentially) disappears. In a sense, this is what the question is about. – Christian Remling Mar 23 '15 at 17:26
  • Ops, sorry, I was indeed careless in reading, answering and commenting, now I see why the answer could (should?) be yes. I'll stop adding nonsense and leave that to people that know what they're talking about! – Marco Spinaci Mar 23 '15 at 18:56

Your Answer


By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.