I am trying to understand the proof of assertion (i) in Proposition 3.10 (page 14) of this paper http://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.3884v3.pdf

$M$ stands for a square free integer which is prime to $7$, $A$ denotes the curve $X_0(49)$, $Y^2=X^3+21X^2+112X$ in Weierstrass form and $A^{(M)}: y^2=x^3+21XMx^2+112M^2x $ is the quadratic twist of $A$ by $\mathbb Q(\sqrt{M})/ \mathbb Q$. We know that $A$ has complex multiplication by $\mathbb Q(\sqrt{-7})$ and that $\mathbb Q(\sqrt{-7})= \mathbb Q(A[2])$.

The authors say that the last equality implies that $A^{(M)}(\mathbb R)$ has one connected component. Could somebody explain to me why this is true, or preferably point me towards relevant literature? Thank you very much

  1. $2$ torsion as a Galois module doesn't change under quadratic twists,

  2. An elliptic curve over the real numbers has two real connected components if and only if all 2-torsion points are real. More generally, the group of real points is isomorphic as a group to S^1 or S^1 * Z/2Z, which are distinguished by their 2-torsion.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.