13
$\begingroup$

Let $E = E_n$ be the $n$-th Morava $E$-theory with coefficient ring $$ E_* = \mathbb{W}(\mathbb{F}_{p^n})[\![u_1,\ldots,u_{n-1}]\!][u^{\pm 1}]. $$ It is usual to consider the completed co-operations $$ E^\vee_* E := \pi_*L_{K(n)}(E \wedge E) $$ rather than the 'ordinary' co-operations $E_*E$. The latter is shown by Hovey (although this was a folklore result) to be isomorphic to $\operatorname{Hom}^c(\mathbb{G}_n,E_*)$ the ring of continuous functions from the $n$-th Morava stabilizer group to $E_*$ under the $\mathfrak{m} = (p,u_1,\ldots,u_{n-1})$-adic topology.

Let $L_0$ be the $L$-completion functor (for example see Appendix A of Hovey-Strickland). It is known that $E^\vee_*E = L_0(E_*E) = (E_*E)^\wedge_{\mathfrak{m}}$. There is a map $\phi:E_*E \to E^\vee_*E$ which can be identified with the usual $\frak{m}$-adic completion map.

Is the map $\phi:E_*E \to E^\vee_* E$ injective?

Standard commutative algebra tells us that the kernel of this map is isomorphic to $\bigcap_{n=0}^\infty \mathfrak{m}^n E_*E$, although it seems difficult to approach this problem in this way.

Here is a closely related question. Let $E(n)$ be the Johnson-Wilson cohomology theory with coefficient ring $$ E(n)_* = \mathbb{Z}_{(p)}[v_1,\ldots,v_{n-1},v_n^{\pm 1}]. $$ Now there is an isomorphism $L_0(E(n)_*E(n)) = E(n)_*^\vee E(n) \simeq \operatorname{Hom}^c(\mathbb{G}_n,\widehat{E(n)}_*)$, where $$\widehat{E(n)}_* \simeq \mathbb{Z}_{(p)}[v_1,\ldots,v_{n-1},v_n^{\pm 1}]^\wedge_I$$ for $I = (p,v_1,\ldots,v_{n-1})$. In this case by work of Johnson it is known that there is an injection of $E(n)_*E(n)$ into $\operatorname{Hom}^c(\mathbb{G}_n \times\mathbb{G}_n,A)$ where $A$ the ring of integers in an unramified degree $n$ extension of the p-adic numbers. It is known that the latter is $L$-complete, and since $E(n)_*E(n) \to L_0(E(n)_*E(n))$ is initial amongst maps with $L$-complete target, in this case it follows that $E(n)_*E(n) \to E(n)^\vee_*E(n)$ is injective.

$\endgroup$
12
$\begingroup$

No, this map is not injective.

To see this, put $W=\mathbb{W}(\mathbb{F}_{p^n})$, which is a free module of finite rank over $\mathbb{Z}_p$. It is standard that $\mathbb{Z}_p\otimes\mathbb{Z}_p$ contains a rational vector space of uncountable dimension, so the same is true of $W\otimes W$. (Here tensor products are implicitly taken over $\mathbb{Z}$ or $\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$; you get the same anwswer either way.) This rational vector space can only map trivially to the group $E^\vee_*E$. Thus, it will suffice to check that $E_*E$ contains a copy of $W\otimes W$. The left and right unit maps provide a map $W\otimes W\to E_0E$. In the opposite direction, we can define a map $\phi:E_0\to W$ sending $u_i$ to $0$ for $0<i<n$. The resulting formal group law over $W$ has logarithm $\sum_kx^{p^{nk}}/p^k$, so the coefficients of the FGL lie in $\mathbb{Q}\cap W=\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$. Because of this, the two resulting FGLs over $W\otimes W$ are the same. Thus, the standard universal property of $BP_*BP$ gives a ring map $$ E_*E = E_*\otimes_{BP_*}BP_*BP\otimes_{BP_*}E_* \to W\otimes W, $$ which is left inverse to our map in the opposite direction.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.