$V=\mathbb C^n$ is a $\mathbb CS_n$-module, where $S_n$ is the symmetric group of degree $n$, via the representation sending a permutation to the corresponding permutation matrix. The tensor power $V^{\otimes m}$ is therefore also a $\mathbb CS_n$-module via the action $\sigma(v_1\otimes\cdots\otimes v_m) = \sigma v_1\otimes\cdots \otimes \sigma v_m$ on elementary tensors.

But $V^{\otimes m}$ is also a $\mathbb CS_m$-module where $S_m$ acts by permuting the tensor factors. These two actions commute and hence $V^{\otimes m}$ is a representation of $S_n\times S_m$ in a natural way. I would like a pointer to the literature on the decomposition of $V^{\otimes m}$ into irreducible representations of $S_n\times S_m$.

up vote 24 down vote accepted

By Schur–Weyl duality there is an isomorphism of $\mathrm{GL}(V) \times S_m$-representations

$$V^{\otimes m} \cong \bigoplus_\lambda \Delta^\lambda(V) \boxtimes S^\lambda$$

where the sum is over all partitions $\lambda$ of $m$ with at most $n$ parts, $\Delta^\lambda$ is the Schur functor for $\lambda$, $S^\lambda$ is the irreducible $\mathbb{C}S_m$-module canonically labelled by $\lambda$ and $\boxtimes$ denotes the outer tensor product of two representations. Restricting to $S_n \times S_m$ we get

$$V^{\otimes m} \cong \bigoplus_\lambda \bigl( \Delta^\lambda(V) \bigl\downarrow^{\mathrm{GL}(V)}_{S_n} \bigr) \boxtimes S^\lambda.$$

Hence

$$[V^{\otimes m} : S^\nu \boxtimes S^\lambda] = [\Delta^\lambda(V) : S^\nu]$$

for all partitions $\nu$ of $n$ and $\lambda$ of $m$ with at most $n$ parts.

Determining the multiplicities on the right-hand side is, as far as I know, an open problem, equivalent to computing inner plethysms of symmetric functions. Some special cases are known. For instance, if $\lambda = (1^m)$ and $m \le n$ then $\Delta^{(1^m)}(V) = \bigwedge^mV = S^{(n-m,1^m)} \oplus S^{(n-m+1,1^{m-1})}$. This result has been reproved, many, times (see Proposition 5.1) in the symmetric group literature.

  • Thanks for this. I supposed it was a Schur-Weyl duality thing. I am surprised this is open. – Benjamin Steinberg Mar 2 '15 at 21:05
  • 4
    Alternatively we could use a version of Schur-Weyl for symmetric groups side to realize the $S_n$ multiplicity spaces as representations of the partition algebra $P_m(n)$, but then we would need to understand restrictions from the partition algebra to $S_m$ which is (as far as I know) also open. – Nate Mar 2 '15 at 22:35

Let $\nu$ be a partition of $n$ and $\lambda$ a partition of $m$. Mark Wildon points out, the multiplicity of $S^\nu \otimes S^\lambda$ in $V^{\otimes m}$ is equal to the multiplicity of an irreducible $S_n$ module $S^\nu$ in the irreducible $Gl_n$ module indexed by the partition $\lambda$.

The latter restatement of this multiplicity is sometimes referred to as "the restriction problem" since it is determining the decomposition of the restriction of an irreducible $Gl_n$ module to $S_n$. People say (me included) that there does not yet exists a satisfactory combinatorial method or positive integral formula for computing this multiplicity (and this is what it means when it is said that the problem is "considered open"), but there is more to say about it because formulae for computing it do exist.

This multiplicity can be expressed in terms of inner plethysm of symmetric functions. If we denote $s_\lambda\{s_\nu\}$ as the Frobenius image of the character of the symmetric group module $\Delta^\lambda(S^\nu)$ (the Schur functor indexed by the partition $\lambda$ applied to an irreducible $S_n$ module indexed by the partition $\nu$), then $$\left< s_\lambda\{s_{(n-1,1)} + s_{(n)}\}, s_\nu \right> = \sum_{\gamma \vdash n} \chi^\nu(\gamma)\frac{s_\lambda[\Xi_\gamma]}{z_\gamma}$$ because the Frobenius characteristic of $V$ is $s_{(n-1,1)} + s_{(n)}$. The right hand side of this expression comes from character theory of the symmetric group $S_n \subseteq Gl_n$, where I have used here the notation $s_\lambda[\Xi_\gamma]$ to denote the evaluation of a Schur function at the eigenvalues of a permutation matrix with cycle structure $\gamma$.

There is an additional computational formula due to Littlewood [1] (for more modern treatment see [2]) that can be used to compute the multiplicity of an irreducible $S_n$ module in an irreducible $Gl_n$ module in terms of operation of outer plethysm of symmetric functions.

The formula is (Theorem XI in [1]$^{(*)}$ and Theorem 4.1 in [2]): \begin{equation} [ \Delta^\lambda(V), S^\nu ] = \left< s_\lambda, s_\nu[1+s_1+s_2+s_3+\cdots] \right> \end{equation} where the square bracket $f[g]$ represents the operation of outer plethysm (in notation from Macdonald's book this is denoted $f \circ g$).

This result is proved and reproved in the literature:

[1] D. E. Littlewood, Products and Plethysms of Characters with Orthogonal, Symplectic and Symmetric Groups, Canad. J. Math., 10, 1958, 17–32.

[2] T. Scharf, J. Y. Thibon, A Hopf-algebra approach to inner plethysm. Adv. in Math. 104 (1994), pp. 30–58.

(*) Technically Littlewood's result (in modern notation) says $\left< s_\lambda\{ s_{(n-1,1)} \}, s_\nu \right> = \left< s_\lambda, s_\nu[ s_1 + s_2 + \cdots ] \right>$, but as Scharf and Thibon point out, this is equivalent to $\left< s_\lambda\{ s_{(n-1,1)} + s_{(n)} \}, s_\nu \right> = \left< s_\lambda, s_\nu[ 1 + s_1 + s_2 + \cdots ] \right>$.

If you wish to compute any of these multiplicities in Sage for a fixed $\lambda$ and $\nu$ (below $\lambda = (3,2)$ and $\nu = (2,1)$), here are three functions which implement the formulae that I have stated above.

sage: s = SymmetricFunctions(QQ).s()
sage: def eq1LHS(la, nu):
....:     n = sum(nu)
....:     return s(la).inner_plethysm(s[n-1,1]+s[n]).scalar(s(nu))

sage: def eq1RHS(la, nu):
....:     n = sum(nu)
....:     return s(la).character_to_frobenius_image(n).scalar(s(nu))

sage: def eq2RHS(la, nu):
....:     m = sum(la)
....:     return s(nu).plethysm(1+sum(s[r] for r in range(1,m+1))).scalar(s(la))

sage: [eq1LHS([3,2],[2,1]), eq1RHS([3,2],[2,1]), eq2RHS([3,2],[2,1])]
[5, 5, 5]

Your Answer

 
discard

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.