-2
$\begingroup$

If $M=G/H$ is a reductive space and $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{h}+\mathfrak{m}$ be the canonical decomposition, then are $\mathfrak{g}$ or $\mathfrak{h}$ or both reductive lie algebras? (in this case, where can I find a proof?)

It is for every ideal $ \mathfrak{a}$ of $\mathfrak{g}$ there exists an ideal $ \mathfrak{b}$ sucht that $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{a}+\mathfrak{b}$ or equivalently the adjoint representation is semi-simple

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ What is a reductive space? $\endgroup$ – Mikhail Borovoi Feb 23 '15 at 4:10
  • $\begingroup$ @MikhailBorovoi According to encyclopedias it means that $\mathfrak h$ $H$-equivariantly splits out of $\mathfrak g$. $\endgroup$ – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე Feb 23 '15 at 8:45
  • $\begingroup$ Also I think $G$ and $H$ must be reductive groups, with $H$ closed subgroup of $G$ (so that $G/H$ is a reductive space means $(G,H)$ is a reductive pair). $\endgroup$ – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე Feb 23 '15 at 8:51
3
$\begingroup$

It depends on the definition of a reductive space $G/H$. Some authors require that in addition to $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{h}+\mathfrak{m}$, $[\mathfrak{h},\mathfrak{m}]\subseteq \mathfrak{m}$, we have that $(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h})$ is a reductive pair of Lie algebras, by which they mean that $\mathfrak{g}$ is reductive, and $\mathfrak{h}$ is reductive in $\mathfrak{g}$. In this case, since $\mathfrak{h}$ is a $\mathfrak{h}$-submodule of $\mathfrak{g}$, this would imply that $\mathfrak{h}$ itself is reductive.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ but for example take $\mathfrak{g}=e_{1}+e_{2}$ as a vector space and the commutator $[e_{1},e_{2}]=e_{2}$ then $\mathfrak{g}$ is not a reductive lie algebra and take $\mathfrak{h}=e_{1}$ then $Lie(\mathfrak{g})/Lie(\mathfrak{h})$ Is a reductive space $\endgroup$ – user66943 Feb 23 '15 at 16:27
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, it depends on the definition. Do you have a reference where your example $Lie(g)/Lie(h)$ is called a reductive space ? $\endgroup$ – Dietrich Burde Feb 24 '15 at 10:21
  • $\begingroup$ @user66943: Your notation such as $Lie(\mathfrak{g})$ seems out of control here. And as Dietrich points out, precise definitions are needed. $\endgroup$ – Jim Humphreys Feb 24 '15 at 19:08

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.