It is well known, that determining the shortest and, the longest Hamilton Cycle of a complete graph with real edge weights are algorithmically two sides of the same medal: one transforms to the other via a sign change of edge weights, requiring at most $O(n)$ additional operations.
I am now wondering, whether the $k$-th-longest Hamilton Cycle problem is $NP$ hard for all $k\in[1,\#T]$ and, if so, what the differences in algorithmic complexity are ($\#T$ denotes the number of tours).
I suspect, that determing the $\frac{\#T}{2}$-th longest Hamilton Cycle is the hardest one and, that it can't be found without the "detour" over either the shortest or the longest one.
Questions: - Which $k$-th longest HC problems are the hardest, resp. the easiest ones?
What are the exact time complexities?
Are there algorithms that directly determine the $k$-th longest HC, i.e. without determining a $h$-th longest HC?
Can the $k$-th longest HC determined from the shortest or longest one in polynomial time?