3
$\begingroup$

Let $H = L^{2}(S^{1},\mathbb{C}^{n})$, $H_{0}\subseteq H$ the subset of maps that extend holomorphically to the unit disc, and $H_{m} = z^{m}H_{0}$. Consider the affine Grassmannian for $GL_{n}$ in the lattice model:

$\mathcal{Gr}_{n} = \left\{ V\subseteq H:\, zV\subseteq V\right\}$

Let me describe two possible filtrations of this object. The first, is by the subspaces whose lattice diagrams have all their sticks and dots concentrated in a band of width $2i$ about zero:

$\mathcal{Gr}_{n}^{i} = \left\{V \in \mathcal{Gr}_{n}:\, H_{i}\subseteq V\subseteq H_{-i}\right\}$

I think this can also be identified as the union of orbits of elements $f \in \mathrm{GL}_{n}(\mathcal{K})$ such that $f(z) = \sum_{\vert k\vert \leq m} A_{k}z^{k}$.

The second filtration I can think of comes from the decomposition of the affine Grassmannian into $\mathcal{Gr}_{\lambda}$'s. For each coroot $\lambda = (\lambda_{1},\dots,\lambda_{n})$ satisfying $\lambda_{1}\geq \lambda_{2}\geq\dots\geq \lambda_{n}$, we get a finite dimensional variety $\mathcal{Gr}_{\lambda}$ from the orbit of $GL_{n}(\mathcal{O})$ through $\text{diag}(z^{\lambda_{1}},\dots,z^{\lambda_{n}})\cdot H_{0}$.

If a coroot $\lambda = (\lambda_{1},\dots,\lambda_{n})$, define its height by $\text{ht}(\lambda) = \sum_{i} \lambda_{i}$. Let $\check{T}/W$ denote the set of Weyl orbits of the coroot lattice, for which I always pick representatives in the positive Weyl chamber, and define:

$X_{i} = \coprod_{\lambda \in \check{T}/W,\, \text{ht}(\lambda) \leq i} \mathcal{Gr}_{\lambda}$

My question: Is $X_{i}$ the same space as $\mathcal{Gr}_{m}^{i}$? I think the main difficulty I'm having with answering this for myself is that I'm not sure how to compute to which $\mathcal{Gr}_{\lambda}$ a given lattice $V$ belongs. Any reference or explanation for this would be much appreciated!

Thanks!

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

This statement isn't true; as you've currently defined everything, your $X_i$ are infinite dimensional (in fact they are unions of connected components.) You want instead to take the $X_i$ unions of $\lambda$ with $i\geq\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_n\geq -i$.

Let $B$ be the Borel for $GL_n(\mathcal{K})$. Both $\mathcal{Gr}_n^i$ and $X_i$ are $B$ invariant (as they are $GL_n(\mathcal{O})$ invariant), so by Bruhat decomposition we just need to check that they contain the same set of points of the form $\operatorname{diag}(z^{\lambda_1},\cdots,z^{\lambda_n})\cdot H_0.$ $\mathcal{Gr}_n^i$ contains such a point if and only if all the $\lambda_i$ are from $-i$ to $i$, and $\mathcal{Gr}_{\lambda'}$ contains such a point if and only if $\lambda$ and $\lambda'$ are Weyl conjugate. This immediately gives what you want.

(As for an explicit description of which $\mathcal{Gr}_{\lambda}$ a given lattice is contained in: This is determined by the "dimensions" of the intersections of the lattice with $H_i$ (where by dimension I really mean valuation of $z$ in the determinant.) This is because this is a $G(\mathcal{O})$ invariant property and then we use Bruhat decomposition as above.)

If you would prefer to avoid using Bruhat decomposition, for $GL_n$ all of this can be done explicitly by explicit diagonalization starting from dimensions of intersections with $H_i$. Sorry if any of this is sketchy; I don't have much time right now, if necessary I can give more details later.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I probably should have noticed that there were infinitely many $\mathcal{Gr}_{\lambda}$'s in each piece. Even for $GL_{2}$ there are the coroots $\text{diag}(z^{n},z^{-n})$. Thanks for your answer! $\endgroup$ – James Mracek Jan 24 '15 at 15:41
  • $\begingroup$ Can you elaborate on what you mean by the valuation of $z$ in the determinant? $\endgroup$ – Tyler Holden Feb 4 '15 at 17:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.