Is there a well-known formula for computing the commutators of Schur polynomials when the variables are Lie algebra elements? If the algebra has a particularly simple commutation relation, is there a nice way to work this out?

If it helps, the algebra in question is easily treatable as the $x_i$ and $\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}$ acting on the left on $\mathbb{C}[x_1, x_2, \ldots]$, which is usually the context the Schur polynomials appear in...I have Schur polynomials $f_n$ and $g_n$ in the variables $\frac{\mu}{k} x_k$ and $-\frac{\mu}{k} \frac{\partial}{\partial x_k}$ respectively for some parameter $\mu$, and want to know about $$ [f_m, g_n] $$ in general, and $$ [f_n, g_n] $$ in particular.


I have an operator $V_\mu(z)$ mapping between `bosonic Fock spaces' $\mathcal{F}_\eta$, the countable-dimensional vector spaces cyclically generated from highest weight vectors $\left| \eta \right>$ by acting freely with the Heisenberg algebra $\mathcal{H} = \mathrm{span}_\mathbb{C}\{\mathbf{1}, \alpha_n: \; n \in \mathbb{Z}\}$. $$ \mathcal{F}_\eta = \mathcal{U}(\mathcal{H}) \cdot \left| \eta \right> $$ where the positive-indexed operators annihilate the highest weight vector; $$ \alpha_n \cdot \left| \eta \right> = 0 \quad \forall n > 0 \\ \alpha_0 \cdot \left| \eta \right> = \eta \left| \eta \right>\\ \mathbf{1} \cdot \left| \eta \right> = \left| \eta \right> $$ and $\mathcal{H}$ has the following well-known commutation relations: $$ [\alpha_m, \alpha_n] = m \delta_{m, -n} \\ [\mathbf{1}, \alpha_n] = 0 \\ $$

$V_\mu(z): \mathcal{F}_\eta \to \mathcal{F}_{\eta + \mu}$ is a screening operator, i.e. $$ V_\mu(z) = e^{\mu q} z^{\mu \eta} \exp\left( \mu \sum_{n > 0}\frac{\alpha_{-n}}{n}z^n \right) \exp\left(-\mu\sum_{n>0}\frac{\alpha_n}{n}z^{-n}\right) $$ which as you can see has exponentials of sums of independent elements, the generating function of the Schur polynomials. We get $$ V_\mu(z) = e^{\mu q} z^{\mu \eta}\sum_{m \in \mathbb{Z}}\sum_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} f_m g_n z^{m-n} $$ where $f_n$ and $g_n$ are the $n$th elementary Schur polynomial in variables $\frac{\mu}{k} \alpha_{-k}$ and $-\frac{\mu}{k}\alpha_k$ respectively.

I am interested in the behaviour of the Fourier modes of this function, taking $$ V_\mu(z) = \sum_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} V_\mu^{(n)} z^{-n-1} $$ and in particular whether they have nice commutation relations.


1 Answer 1


No, there will be no nice formula for $[V_{\mu}^{(n)},V_{\lambda}^{(m)}]$ in general.

Compute first

$$ V_{\mu}(z_1) V_{\lambda}(z_2)=p(z_1,z_2) : V_{\mu}(z_1)V_{\lambda}(z_2) :$$ $$ V_{\lambda}(z_2) V_{\mu}(z_1)=q(z_1,z_2) : V_{\mu}(z_1)V_{\lambda}(z_2) :$$ where $: \cdot :$ is the normal ordering and $p(z_1,z_2)$ and $q(z_1,z_2)$ are easily computed. Subtract the two expressions and try to simplify the right hand-side. This will be possible when $p(z_1,z_2)-q(z_1,z_2)$ is a derivative of the formal $\delta$-function in $z_1$ and $z_2$.

Here are some special cases:

For $\lambda \cdot \nu \in 2 \mathbb{N}$, your answer should be zero.

For $\lambda \cdot \nu \in - 2\mathbb{N}$, you do get a derivative of the delta function, but the resulting expression is quickly getting very messy.

For $\lambda \cdot \nu \in 2 \mathbb{Z}+1$, the commutator doesn't give a delta function, so it is more natural to consider the anti-bracket. In particular, if $\lambda=1$ and $\mu=-1$ your operators form a pair of free fermions due to boson-fermion correspondence.

For $\lambda \cdot \mu \notin \mathbb{Z}$, the only hope of getting reasonable expressions is by replacing brackets with "generalized brackets", but that's a whole different story ($\leadsto$ parafermions).

  • $\begingroup$ I went away and thought about this. Now I've read some of Frenkel & Ben-Zvi's book on vertex operators. I could have arrived at this through the application of the OPE $[A_m, B_n] = \sum_{k \geq 0} \binom mk (A_k \cdot B)_{m + n - k}$ , where the vertex operators of weight $\mu$ come from the vacua, $V_\mu(z) = Y( \left| \mu \right>, z)$ in an appropriate superalgebra. $\endgroup$ Feb 18, 2015 at 4:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.