2
$\begingroup$

Does there exist an integral domain $R$ of characteristic $p > 0$ that is perfect (i.e., $x \mapsto x^p$ is bijective on $R$) but not integrally closed in its field of fractions?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Tons of them. Let $R$ be a domain with integral closure $R'$ in its fraction field $K$ of characteristic $p$ such that ${\rm{Spec}}(R') \rightarrow {\rm{Spec}}(R)$ has a fiber with at least 2 points or a residue field extension not purely inseparable (i.e., $R'$ is not radiciel over $R$); easy to make such $R$. For the perfect closure $K_p$ of $K$, the ring $R_p$ of elements with a $p$-power in $R$ does the job (since $R_p$ is radiciel over $R$ and $R'_p$ is radiciel over $R_p$ with $R'_p$ normal and integral over $R_p$: if $R_p$ is normal then $R'_p=R_p$ and hence $R'$ is radiciel over $R$. $\endgroup$ – user74230 Dec 15 '14 at 17:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I should have mentioned that taking $R$ to be the coordinate ring of a nodal cubic gives something slightly simpler than the variant in the example below. $\endgroup$ – user74230 Dec 15 '14 at 22:13
  • $\begingroup$ Very nice! I like this family of examples most so far. $\endgroup$ – Lisa S. Dec 15 '14 at 23:46
6
$\begingroup$

Let $S$ be the local ring of nodal curve, $R$ = inverse limit $Frob: S \to S$. For example:

  • $k$ a perfect field,
  • $f(x,y)=y^{p+1}-x^{p+1}(1+x)$,
  • $R=k[x^{1/p^{\infty}},y^{1/p^{\infty}}]/(f^{1/p^{\infty}})$.

Here's a complete local example:

  • $k$ a perfect field,
  • $f(x,y)=y^{p}-x^{p}y-x^{p+1}$,
  • $R=k[[x^{1/p^{\infty}},y^{1/p^{\infty}}]]/(f^{1/p^{\infty}})$.

In each example $(y/x)$ is integral over $R$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Though the formatting is actually pretty good, I think you should really TeX/MathJax this answer. $\endgroup$ – jmc Dec 15 '14 at 12:28
  • $\begingroup$ It appears to me that your ring is seminormal. Is every perfect integral domain a seminormal ring? $\endgroup$ – Jason Starr Dec 15 '14 at 12:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JasonStarr Let k=perfect field char p>3, R=k[[x^(1/2p^n),x^(1/3p^n):n>=0]]. Then a=x^(1/2), b=x^(1/3), a^2=b^3, but x^(1/6) isn't in R so R isn't seminormal. R is another negative answer to the original question. (Sorry for the primitive formatting.) $\endgroup$ – David Lampert Dec 15 '14 at 13:35
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidLampert — I did some reformatting for you. If you just add $-signs around your maths, everything suddenly looks a lot nicer (-; $\endgroup$ – jmc Dec 15 '14 at 13:50
  • $\begingroup$ @jmc Thank you. I'm a novice with formatting. $\endgroup$ – David Lampert Dec 15 '14 at 13:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.