Let $P\colon E \to F$ be an elliptic pseudodifferential operator over $M$. Assuming that $P$ defines a finitely summable Fredholm module, we may apply the Chern-Connes character to it to get a cyclic cocycle and this may then be mapped into the homology of $M$, i.e., we have $ch_\ast(P) \in H_\ast(M)$.

On the other hand, we may do the clutching construction using the symbol $\sigma(P)$ of $P$ to get an element $[\sigma_P] \in K_{cpt}^0(TM)$, apply the usual cohomological Chern character, integrate over the fiber, and finally multiply with the Todd genus of $M$, to get the index class $ind(P) = \pi_! ch^\ast [\sigma_P] \wedge Td(M) \in H^\ast(M)$. (I think I forgot here some sign $(-1)^?$.)

If $P$ is a graded operator (so that $E$ and $F$ are the positive and negative parts, respectively, of the vector bundle on which $P$ acts) we have $ch_\ast(P) \in H_{ev}(M)$ and Connes and Moscovici proved in Cyclic Cohomology, The Novikov Conjecture And Hyperbolic Groups that this is the Poincare dual of $ind(P)$ (up to some constants that only depend on the degree $q$ in which we compare these classes).

But if $P$ is an ungraded operator (in this case we would have $E=F$) we get $ch_\ast(P) \in H_{odd}(M)$ since now $P$ itself defines an odd $K$-homology class. But the Poincare dual of $ind(P)$ still lives in $H_{ev}(M)$, i.e., we can not compare them.

What is the correct formulation of the local index formula in the case of ungraded operators? Is it in the literature somewhere?

I expect somehow a small fix to the construction of the index class $ind(P)$ such that it lives then in the correct degrees (maybe something like taking a suitable product with $S^1$ similarly as the trick used by Connes and Moscovici in their above cited paper where they reduced from the case of odd-dimensional manifolds to even-dimensional ones).

  • $\begingroup$ There are a number of index theorems for operators whose K-homology classes live in the odd degree groups for whatever reason, but typically you need the operator to have some extra structure. Do you have a specific operator in mind? $\endgroup$ – Paul Siegel Dec 2 '14 at 16:25
  • $\begingroup$ Typically, you would replace the operator $P$ by $P \oplus P^{\ast}: E \oplus F \to E \oplus F$. This is graded, and the index (in the graded sense) is the usual index. An ungraded operator has an index in $K^1$, but only if it is self-adjoint. $\endgroup$ – Johannes Ebert Dec 2 '14 at 21:45
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, I assume that $P$ is essentially self-adjoint so that it indeed defines an element of $K_1(M)$. I also assume the manifold to be compact (and without boundary). Applying the homological Chern character (constructed by using Connes' cyclic cohomology), we get an element of $H_\ast(M)$ and I want to identify the Poincare dual of it. If $P$ is graded the Poincare dual is, up to some universal constants, $ind(P)$ which is computed / constructed using the clutching construction. This is a generalization of Atiyah-Singer. But what is this Poincare dual now in the ungraded case? $\endgroup$ – AlexE Dec 3 '14 at 8:27

Meanwhile I found the answer to my question in the literature, concretely in:

Baum, Douglas, K-Homology and Index Theory, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 38 (1982), Part 1.

If $P\colon E \to E$ is elliptic and self-adjoint, then its symbol $\sigma(P) \colon \pi^\ast E \to \pi^\ast E$ is a self-adjoint automorphism, where $\pi\colon SM \to M$ denotes the unit sphere bundle. So we have a splitting $\pi^\ast E = E^+ \oplus E^-$, where $E^+$ and $E^-$ are fiber wise spanned by the positive, resp. negative, eigenvalues of $\sigma(P)$, and we define the symbol class $\sigma_P$ of $P$ as $\sigma_P := [E^+] \in K^0(SM)$. To get the index class, we do now the same as in the graded case: $ind(P) := (-1)^{n(n+1)/2} \pi_! ch^\ast [\sigma_P] \wedge Td(M) \in H^\ast(M)$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.